Artikolu 65 📖 RĠPD (GDPR). Soluzzjoni għat-tilwim mill-Bord

Artikolu 65 RĠPD (GDPR). Soluzzjoni għat-tilwim mill-Bord

Article 65 GDPR. Dispute resolution by the Board

1. Sabiex jiżgura l-applikazzjoni korretta u konsistenti ta’ dan ir-Regolament f’każijiet individwali, il-Bord għandu jadotta deċiżjoni vinkolanti fil-każijiet li ġejjin:

1. In order to ensure the correct and consistent application of this Regulation in individual cases, the Board shall adopt a binding decision in the following cases:

(a) fejn, f’każ imsemmi fl-Artikolu 60(4), awtorità superviżorja kkonċernata tkun qajmet oġġezzjoni rilevanti u motivata għal abbozz ta’ deċiżjoni tal-awtorità ewlenija jew l-awtorità ewlenija tkun ċaħdet tali oġġezzjoni għar-raġuni li ma tkunx rilevanti jew motivata. Id-deċiżjoni vinkolanti għandha tikkonċerna l-kwistjonijiet kollha li jkunu s-suġġett tal-oġġezzjoni rilevanti u motivata, b’mod partikolari jekk ikunx hemm ksur ta’ dan ir-Regolament;

(a) where, in a case referred to in Article 60(4), a supervisory authority concerned has raised a relevant and reasoned objection to a draft decision of the lead supervisory authority and the lead supervisory authority has not followed the objection or has rejected such an objection as being not relevant or reasoned. The binding decision shall concern all the matters which are the subject of the relevant and reasoned objection, in particular whether there is an infringement of this Regulation;

Testi relatati

Artikolu 60 RĠPD (GDPR). Kooperazzjoni bejn l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati oħra

Article 60 GDPR. Cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned

[…]

4. Fejn kwalunkwe mill-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati l-oħra f’perijodu ta’ żmien ta’ erba’ ġimgħat wara li tkun ġiet ikkonsultata f’konformità mal-paragrafu 3 ta’ dan l-Artikolu, tesprimi oġġezzjoni rilevanti u motivata għall-abbozz ta’ deċiżjoni, l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija għandha, jekk ma ssegwix l-oġġezzjoni rilevanti u motivata jew tkun tal-fehma li l-oġġezzjoni mhijiex rilevanti jew motivata, tissottometti l-kwistjoni lill-mekkaniżmu ta’ konsistenza msemmi fl-Artikolu 63.

4. Where any of the other supervisory authorities concerned within a period of four weeks after having been consulted in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article, expresses a relevant and reasoned objection to the draft decision, the lead supervisory authority shall, if it does not follow the relevant and reasoned objection or is of the opinion that the objection is not relevant or reasoned, submit the matter to the consistency mechanism referred to in Article 63.

[…]

(b) fejn ikun hemm fehmiet konfliġġenti dwar liema mill-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati tkun kompetenti għall-istabbiliment ewlieni;

(b) where there are conflicting views on which of the supervisory authorities concerned is competent for the main establishment;

(c) fejn awtorità superviżorja kompetenti ma titlobx l-opinjoni tal-Bord fil-każijiet imsemmija fl-Artikolu 64(1), jew ma ssegwix l-opinjoni tal-Bord maħruġa taħt l-Artikolu 64. F’dak il-każ, kwalunkwe awtorità superviżorja kkonċernata jew il-Kummissjoni tista’ tikkomunika l-kwistjoni lill-Bord.

(c) where a competent supervisory authority does not request the opinion of the Board in the cases referred to in Article 64(1), or does not follow the opinion of the Board issued under Article 64. In that case, any supervisory authority concerned or the Commission may communicate the matter to the Board.

Testi relatati

Artikolu 64 RĠPD (GDPR). Opinjoni tal-Bord

Article 64 GDPR. Opinion of the Board

1. Il-Bord għandu joħroġ opinjoni fejn awtorità superviżorja kompetenti tkun biħsiebha tadotta kwalunkwe waħda mill-miżuri hawn taħt. Għal dak il-għan, l-awtorità superviżorja kompetenti għandha tikkomunika l-abbozz ta’ deċiżjoni lill-Bord, meta hija:

1. The Board shall issue an opinion where a competent supervisory authority intends to adopt any of the measures below. To that end, the competent supervisory authority shall communicate the draft decision to the Board, when it:

(a) ikollha l-għan li tadotta lista tal-operazzjonijiet ta’ pproċessar soġġetta għar-rekwiżit għal valutazzjoni tal-impatt tal-protezzjoni tad-data skont l-Artikolu 35(4);

(a) aims to adopt a list of the processing operations subject to the requirement for a data protection impact assessment pursuant to Article 35(4);

(b) tikkonċerna suġġett skont l-Artikolu 40(7) jekk abbozz ta’ kodiċi ta’ kondotta jew emenda jew estensjoni ta’ kodiċi ta’ kondotta jkunux konformit ma’ dan ir-Regolament;

(b) concerns a matter pursuant to Article 40(7) whether a draft code of conduct or an amendment or extension to a code of conduct complies with this Regulation;

(c) ikollha l-għan li tapprova l-kriterji għall-akkreditazzjoni ta’ korp skont l-Artikolu 41(3) jew korp ta’ ċertifikazzjoni skont l-Artikolu 43(3);

(c) aims to approve the requirements for accreditation of a body pursuant to Article 41(3), of a certification body pursuant to Article 43(3) or the criteria for certification referred to in Article 42(5);

(d) ikollha l-għan li tiddetermina l-klawżoli standard ta’ protezzjoni tad-data msemmija fil-punt (d) tal-Artikolu 46(2) u fl-Artikolu 28(8);

(d) aims to determine standard data protection clauses referred to in point (d) of Article 46(2) and in Article 28(8);

(e) ikollha l-għan li tawtorizza l-klawżoli kuntrattwali msemmija fil-punt (a) tal-Artikolu 46(3); jew

(e) aims to authorise contractual clauses referred to in point (a) of Article 46(3); or

(f) ikollha l-għan li tapprova regoli korporattivi vinkolanti fis-sens tal-Artikolu 47.

(f) aims to approve binding corporate rules within the meaning of Article 47.

[…]

2. Id-deċiżjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 għandha tiġi adottata fi żmien xahar mir-riferiment tas-suġġett minn maġġoranza ta’ żewġ terzi tal-membri tal-Bord. Dak il-perijodu jista’ jiġi estiż għal xahar ieħor filwaqt li jittieħed kont tal-kumplessità tas-suġġett. Id-deċiżjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 għandha tkun motivata u indirizzata lill-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati kollha u tkun vinkolanti għalihom.

2. The decision referred to in paragraph 1 shall be adopted within one month from the referral of the subject-matter by a two-thirds majority of the members of the Board. That period may be extended by a further month on account of the complexity of the subject-matter. The decision referred to in paragraph 1 shall be reasoned and addressed to the lead supervisory authority and all the supervisory authorities concerned and binding on them.

3. Fejn il-Bord ma setax jadotta deċiżjoni fil-perijodi msemmija fil-paragrafu 2, huwa għandu jadotta d-deċiżjoni tiegħu fi żmien ġimagħtejn wara l-iskadenza tat-tieni xahar imsemmi fil-paragrafu 2 b’maġġoranza sempliċi tal-membri tal-Bord. Fejn ikun hemm qasma indaqs bejn il-membri tal-Bord, id-deċiżjoni għandha tiġi adottata permezz tal-vot tal-President tiegħu.

3. Where the Board has been unable to adopt a decision within the periods referred to in paragraph 2, it shall adopt its decision within two weeks following the expiration of the second month referred to in paragraph 2 by a simple majority of the members of the Board. Where the members of the Board are split, the decision shall by adopted by the vote of its Chair.

4. L-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati m’għandhomx jadottaw deċiżjoni dwar is-suġġett ippreżentat lill-Bord skont il-paragrafu 1 matul il-perijodi msemmija fil-paragrafi 2 u 3.

4. The supervisory authorities concerned shall not adopt a decision on the subject matter submitted to the Board under paragraph 1 during the periods referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3.

5. Il-President tal-Bord għandu jinnotifika, mingħajr dewmien żejjed, id-deċiżjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 lill-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati. Huwa għandu jinforma lill-Kummissjoni b’dan. Id-deċiżjoni għandha tiġi ppubblikata fuq is-sit elettroniku tal-Bord mingħajr dewmien wara li l-awtorità superviżorja tkun innotifikat id-deċiżjoni finali msemmija fil-paragrafu 6.

5. The Chair of the Board shall notify, without undue delay, the decision referred to in paragraph 1 to the supervisory authorities concerned. It shall inform the Commission thereof. The decision shall be published on the website of the Board without delay after the supervisory authority has notified the final decision referred to in paragraph 6.

6. L-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija jew, skont kif ikun il-każ, l-awtorità superviżorja li quddiemha jitressaq l-ilment, għandha tadotta d-deċiżjoni finali tagħha abbażi tad-deċiżjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 ta’ dan l-Artikolu, mingħajr dewmien żejjed u mhux aktar tard minn xahar wara li l-Bord jkun innotifika d-deċiżjoni tiegħu. L-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija jew, skont kif ikun il-każ, l-awtorità superviżorja li quddiemha jitressaq l-ilment, għandha tinforma lill-Bord dwar id-data meta d-deċiżjoni finali tagħha tkun ġiet innotifikata lill-kontrollur jew il-proċessur u lis-suġġett tad-data rispettivament. Id-deċiżjoni finali tal-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati għandha tiġi adottata taħt it-termini tal-Artikolu 60(7), (8) u (9). Id-deċiżjoni finali għandha tirreferi għad-deċiżjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 ta’ dan l-Artikolu u għandha tispeċifika li d-deċiżjoni msemmija f’dak il-paragrafu ser tiġi ppubblikata fuq is-sit elettroniku tal-Bord f’konformità mal-paragrafu 5 ta’ dan l-Artikolu. Id-deċiżjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 ta’ dan l-Artikolu għandha tkun mehmuża mad-deċiżjoni finali.

6. The lead supervisory authority or, as the case may be, the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged shall adopt its final decision on the basis of the decision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, without undue delay and at the latest by one month after the Board has notified its decision. The lead supervisory authority or, as the case may be, the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged, shall inform the Board of the date when its final decision is notified respectively to the controller or the processor and to the data subject. The final decision of the supervisory authorities concerned shall be adopted under the terms of Article 60(7), (8) and (9). The final decision shall refer to the decision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and shall specify that the decision referred to in that paragraph will be published on the website of the Board in accordance with paragraph 5 of this Article. The final decision shall attach the decision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.

Testi relatati

Artikolu 60 RĠPD (GDPR). Kooperazzjoni bejn l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati oħra

Article 60 GDPR. Cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned

[…]

7. L-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija għandha tadotta u tinnotifika d-deċiżjoni lill-istabbiliment ewlieni jew l-istabbiliment uniku tal-kontrollur jew il-proċessur, skont kif ikun il-każ, u tinforma l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati l-oħra u lill-Bord dwar id-deċiżjoni inkwistjoni inkluż ġabra fil-qosor tal-fatti u r-raġunijiet rilevanti. L-awtorità superviżorja li quddiemha jitressaq ilment għandha tinforma lill-ilmentatur bid-deċiżjoni.

7. The lead supervisory authority shall adopt and notify the decision to the main establishment or single establishment of the controller or processor, as the case may be and inform the other supervisory authorities concerned and the Board of the decision in question, including a summary of the relevant facts and grounds. The supervisory authority with which a complaint has been lodged shall inform the complainant on the decision.

8. B’deroga mill-paragrafu 7, fejn ilment jitwarrab jew jiġi miċħud, l-awtorità superviżorja li quddiemha tressaq l-ilment għandha tadotta d-deċiżjoni u tinnotifikaha lill-ilmentatur u għandha tinforma lill-kontrollur b’din.

8. By derogation from paragraph 7, where a complaint is dismissed or rejected, the supervisory authority with which the complaint was lodged shall adopt the decision and notify it to the complainant and shall inform the controller thereof.

9. Fejn l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati jaqblu li jwarrbu jew jiċħdu partijiet ta’ lment u li jieħdu azzjoni dwar partijiet oħra ta’ dak l-ilment, għandha tiġi adottata deċiżjoni separata għal kull waħda minn dawk il-partijiet tal-kwistjoni. L-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija għandha tadotta d-deċiżjoni għall-parti li tikkonċerna azzjonijiet b’rabta mal-kontrollur, għandha tinnotifikaha lill-istabbiliment ewlieni jew l-istabbiliment uniku tal-kontrollur jew il-proċessur fit-territorju tal-Istat Membru tiegħu u għandha tinforma lill-ilmentatur b’dan, waqt li l-awtorità superviżorja tal-ilmentatur għandha tadotta d-deċiżjoni għall-parti li tikkonċerna t-twarrib jew iċ-ċaħda ta’ dak l-ilment, u għandha tinnotifikaha lil dak l-ilmentatur u għandha tinforma lill-kontrollur jew il-proċessur b’dan.

9. Where the lead supervisory authority and the supervisory authorities concerned agree to dismiss or reject parts of a complaint and to act on other parts of that complaint, a separate decision shall be adopted for each of those parts of the matter. The lead supervisory authority shall adopt the decision for the part concerning actions in relation to the controller, shall notify it to the main establishment or single establishment of the controller or processor on the territory of its Member State and shall inform the complainant thereof, while the supervisory authority of the complainant shall adopt the decision for the part concerning dismissal or rejection of that complaint, and shall notify it to that complainant and shall inform the controller or processor thereof.

Regolament Ġenerali dwar il-Protezzjoni tad-Data (RĠPD, GDPR)

General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR)

The latest consolidated version of the Regulation with corrections by Corrigendum, OJ L 127, 23.5.2018, p. 2 ((EU) 2016/679). Source: EUR-lex.

Premessi Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza Ħalli kumment

Premessi

(136) Fl-applikazzjoni tal-mekkaniżmu ta' konsistenza, il-Bord għandu joħroġ opinjoni, f'perijodu ta' żmien stabbilit, jekk dan jiġi deċiż mill-maġġoranza tal-membri tiegħu jew jekk jintalab jagħmel dan minn kwalunkwe awtorità superviżorja kkonċernata jew mill-Kummissjoni. Il-Bord għandu jkollu wkoll is-setgħa li jadotta deċiżjonijiet legalment vinkolanti fejn ikun hemm tilwim bejn l-awtoritajiet superviżorji. Għal dak il-għan, huwa għandu joħroġ, fil-prinċipju b'maġġoranza ta' żewġ terzi tal-membri tiegħu, deċiżjonijiet legalment vinkolanti f'każijiet speċifikati b'mod ċar fejn ikun hemm fehmiet konfliġġenti fost l-awtoritajiet superviżorji, b'mod partikolari fil-mekkaniżmu ta' kooperazzjoni bejn l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati dwar il-merti tal-każ, b'mod partikolari jekk kienx hemm ksur ta' dan ir-Regolament.

(136) In applying the consistency mechanism, the Board should, within a determined period of time, issue an opinion, if a majority of its members so decides or if so requested by any supervisory authority concerned or the Commission. The Board should also be empowered to adopt legally binding decisions where there are disputes between supervisory authorities. For that purpose, it should issue, in principle by a two-thirds majority of its members, legally binding decisions in clearly specified cases where there are conflicting views among supervisory authorities, in particular in the cooperation mechanism between the lead supervisory authority and supervisory authorities concerned on the merits of the case, in particular whether there is an infringement of this Regulation.

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN)

Documents

EDPB, Guidelines 03/2021 on the application of Article 65(1)(a) GDPR (2021).

Ħalli kumment

[js-disqus]