Artikolu 66 📖 RĠPD (GDPR). Proċedura ta' urġenza

Artikolu 66 RĠPD (GDPR). Proċedura ta' urġenza

Article 66 GDPR. Urgency procedure

1. F’ċirkostanzi eċċezzjonali, fejn awtorità superviżorja kkonċernata tqis li hemm ħtieġa urġenti li taġixxi sabiex tipproteġi id-drittijiet u l-libertajiet tas-suġġetti tad-data, hija tista’, b’deroga mill-mekkaniżmu ta’ konsistenza msemmi fl-Artikoli 63, 64 u 65a jew il-proċedura msemmija fl-Artikolu 60, tadotta minnufih miżuri proviżorji maħsuba biex jipproduċu effetti legali fit-territorju tagħha stess b’perijodu speċifikat ta’ validità li ma għandux jaqbeż it-tliet xhur. L-awtorità superviżorja għandha, mingħajr dewmien, tikkomunika dawk il-miżuri u r-raġunijiet għall-adozzjoni tagħhom, lill-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati l-oħra, lill-Bord u lill-Kummissjoni.

1. In exceptional circumstances, where a supervisory authority concerned considers that there is an urgent need to act in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects, it may, by way of derogation from the consistency mechanism referred to in Articles 63, 64 and 65 or the procedure referred to in Article 60, immediately adopt provisional measures intended to produce legal effects on its own territory with a specified period of validity which shall not exceed three months. The supervisory authority shall, without delay, communicate those measures and the reasons for adopting them to the other supervisory authorities concerned, to the Board and to the Commission.

Testi relatati

Artikolu 60 RĠPD (GDPR). Kooperazzjoni bejn l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati oħra

Article 60 GDPR. Cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned

Artikolu 63 RĠPD (GDPR). Mekkaniżmu ta' konsistenza

Article 63 GDPR. Consistency mechanism

Artikolu 64 RĠPD (GDPR). Opinjoni tal-Bord

Article 64 GDPR. Opinion of the Board

Artikolu 65 RĠPD (GDPR). Soluzzjoni għat-tilwim mill-Bord

Article 65 GDPR. Dispute resolution by the Board

2. Fejn awtorità superviżorja tkun ħadet miżura skont il-paragrafu 1 u tqis li miżuri finali jinħtieġu jiġu adottati b’mod urġenti, hija tista’ titlob opinjoni urġenti jew deċiżjoni vinkolanti urġenti mill-Bord, billi tagħti r-raġunijiet għat-talba ta’ tali opinjoni jew deċiżjoni.

2. Where a supervisory authority has taken a measure pursuant to paragraph 1 and considers that final measures need urgently be adopted, it may request an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision from the Board, giving reasons for requesting such opinion or decision.

3. Kwalunkwe awtorità superviżorja tista’ titlob opinjoni urġenti jew deċiżjoni vinkolanti urġenti, skont kif ikun il-każ, mill-Bord fejn awtorità superviżorja kompetenti ma tkunx ħadet miżura xierqa f’sitwazzjoni fejn ikun hemm ħtieġa urġenti ta’ azzjoni, sabiex jiġu protetti d-drittijiet u l-libertajiet tas-suġġetti tad-data, filwaqt li tagħti r-raġunijiet għat-talba ta’ tali opinjoni jew deċiżjoni, inkluż għall-ħtieġa urġenti ta’ azzjoni.

3. Any supervisory authority may request an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision, as the case may be, from the Board where a competent supervisory authority has not taken an appropriate measure in a situation where there is an urgent need to act, in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects, giving reasons for requesting such opinion or decision, including for the urgent need to act.

4. B’deroga mill-Artikolu 64(3) u l-Artikolu 65(2), opinjoni urġenti jew deċiżjoni vinkolanti urġenti msemmija fil-paragrafi 2 u 3 ta’ dan l-Artikolu għandha tiġi adottata fi żmien ġimagħtejn permezz ta’ maġġoranza sempliċi tal-membri tal-Bord.

4. By derogation from Article 64(3) and Article 65(2), an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article shall be adopted within two weeks by simple majority of the members of the Board.

Testi relatati

Artikolu 64 RĠPD (GDPR). Opinjoni tal-Bord

Article 64 GDPR. Opinion of the Board

[…]

3. Fil-każijiet imsemmija fil-paragrafi 1 u 2, il-Bord għandu joħroġ opinjoni dwar is-suġġett sottomess lilu dment li ma jkunx diġà ħareġ opinjoni dwar l-istess suġġett. Dik l-opinjoni għandha tiġi adottata fi żmien tmien ġimgħat b’maġġoranza sempliċi tal-membri tal-Bord. Dak il-perijodu jista’ jiġi estiż b’sitt ġimgħat oħra, filwaqt li jittieħed kont tal-kumplessità tas-suġġett. Fir-rigward tal-abbozz ta’ deċiżjoni msemmi fil-paragrafu 1 iċċirkolat lill-membri tal-Bord f’konformità mal-paragrafu 5, membru li ma jkunx oġġezzjona f’perijodu raġonevoli indikat mill-President għandu jitqies li jkun qabel mal-abbozz ta’ deċiżjoni.

3. In the cases referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Board shall issue an opinion on the matter submitted to it provided that it has not already issued an opinion on the same matter. That opinion shall be adopted within eight weeks by simple majority of the members of the Board. That period may be extended by a further six weeks, taking into account the complexity of the subject matter. Regarding the draft decision referred to in paragraph 1 circulated to the members of the Board in accordance with paragraph 5, a member which has not objected within a reasonable period indicated by the Chair, shall be deemed to be in agreement with the draft decision.

[…]

Artikolu 65 RĠPD (GDPR). Soluzzjoni għat-tilwim mill-Bord

Article 65 GDPR. Dispute resolution by the Board

[…]

2. Id-deċiżjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 għandha tiġi adottata fi żmien xahar mir-riferiment tas-suġġett minn maġġoranza ta’ żewġ terzi tal-membri tal-Bord. Dak il-perijodu jista’ jiġi estiż għal xahar ieħor filwaqt li jittieħed kont tal-kumplessità tas-suġġett. Id-deċiżjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 għandha tkun motivata u indirizzata lill-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati kollha u tkun vinkolanti għalihom.

2. The decision referred to in paragraph 1 shall be adopted within one month from the referral of the subject-matter by a two-thirds majority of the members of the Board. That period may be extended by a further month on account of the complexity of the subject-matter. The decision referred to in paragraph 1 shall be reasoned and addressed to the lead supervisory authority and all the supervisory authorities concerned and binding on them.

[…]

Regolament Ġenerali dwar il-Protezzjoni tad-Data (RĠPD, GDPR)

General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR)

The latest consolidated version of the Regulation with corrections by Corrigendum, OJ L 127, 23.5.2018, p. 2 ((EU) 2016/679). Source: EUR-lex.

Premessi Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza Ħalli kumment

Premessi

(137) Jista' jkun hemm ħtieġa urġenti ta' azzjoni għall-protezzjoni tad-drittijiet u l-libertajiet tas-suġġetti tad-data, b'mod partikolari meta jkun jeżisti l-periklu li l-infurzar ta' dritt ta' suġġett tad-data jista' jiġi mfixkel b'mod konsiderevoli. Għaldaqstant, awtorità superviżorja għandha tkun tista' tadotta miżuri proviżorji debitament ġustifikati fit-territorju tagħha b'perijodu speċifiku ta' validità li m'għandux jaqbeż tliet xhur.

(137) There may be an urgent need to act in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects, in particular when the danger exists that the enforcement of a right of a data subject could be considerably impeded. A supervisory authority should therefore be able to adopt duly justified provisional measures on its territory with a specified period of validity which should not exceed three months.

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN) EDPB, Urgent Binding Decision 01/2021 on the request under Article 66(2) GDPR from the Hamburg (German) Supervisory Authority for ordering the adoption of final measures regarding Facebook Ireland Limited (2021)

Ħalli kumment

[js-disqus]