Artikolu 13 📖 RĠPD (GDPR). Informazzjoni li għandha tiġi pprovduta fejn tinġabar data personali mis-suġġett tad-data

Artikolu 13 RĠPD (GDPR). Informazzjoni li għandha tiġi pprovduta fejn tinġabar data personali mis-suġġett tad-data

Article 13 GDPR. Information to be provided where personal data are collected from the data subject

1. Fejn data personali relatata ma’ suġġett tad-data tinġabar mingħand is-suġġett tad-data, il-kontrollur għandu, fil-ħin li tinkiseb id-data personali, jipprovdi l-informazzjoni kollha li ġejja lis-suġġett tad-data:

1. Where personal data relating to a data subject are collected from the data subject, the controller shall, at the time when personal data are obtained, provide the data subject with all of the following information:

Premessi Testi relatati

Premessi

(60) Il-prinċipji ta' pproċessar ġust u trasparenti jeħtieġu li s-suġġett tad-data jkun informat bl-eżistenza tal-attività tal-ipproċessar u l-għanijiet tagħha. Il-kontrollur għandu jipprovdi lis-suġġett tad-data bi kwalunkwe informazzjoni ulterjuri li tkun meħtieġa biex jiġi żgurat ipproċessar ġust u trasparenti b'kont meħud taċ-ċirkostanzi speċifiċi u l-kuntest li fih tiġi pproċessata d-data personali. Barra minn hekk, is-suġġett tad-data għandu jkun informat bl-eżistenza tat-tfassil tal-profil, u l-konsegwenzi ta' dan it-tfassil tal-profil. Fejn id-data personali tinġabar mis-suġġett tad-data, is-suġġett tad-data għandu jiġi infurmat ukoll dwar jekk hux obbligat jipprovdi d-data personali u dwar il-konsegwenzi, fejn huwa ma jipprovdix tali data. Dik l-informazzjoni tista' tingħata flimkien ma' ikoni standardizzati sabiex tingħata ħarsa ġenerali lejn l-ipproċessar intenzjonat b'mod li jidher faċilment, li jinftiehem u li jinqara sew. Fejn l-ikoni jkunu ppreżentati b'mod elettroniku, dawn għandhom ikunu jistgħu jinqraw minn magna.

(60) The principles of fair and transparent processing require that the data subject be informed of the existence of the processing operation and its purposes. The controller should provide the data subject with any further information necessary to ensure fair and transparent processing taking into account the specific circumstances and context in which the personal data are processed. Furthermore, the data subject should be informed of the existence of profiling and the consequences of such profiling. Where the personal data are collected from the data subject, the data subject should also be informed whether he or she is obliged to provide the personal data and of the consequences, where he or she does not provide such data. That information may be provided in combination with standardised icons in order to give in an easily visible, intelligible and clearly legible manner, a meaningful overview of the intended processing. Where the icons are presented electronically, they should be machine-readable.

Testi relatati

Article 29 Working Party Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679

Timing for provision of information

Articles 13 and 14 set out information which must be provided to the data subject at the commencement phase of the processing cycle. Article 13 applies to the scenario where the data is collected from the data subject. This includes personal data that: • a data subject consciously provides to a data controller (e.g. when completing an online form); or • a data controller collects from a data subject by observation (e.g. using automated data capturing devices or data capturing software such as cameras, network equipment, Wi-Fi tracking, RFID or other types of sensors). Article 14 applies in the scenario where the data have not been obtained from the data subject. This includes personal data which a data controller has obtained from sources such as: • third party data controllers; • publicly available sources; • data brokers; or • other data subjects.

(a) l-identità u d-dettalji ta’ kuntatt tal-kontrollur u, fejn applikabbli, tar-rappreżentant tal-kontrollur;

(a) the identity and the contact details of the controller and, where applicable, of the controller’s representative;

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN) Article 29 Working Party, Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679, WP260 rev.01 (2018):

This information should allow for easy identification of the controller and preferably allow for different forms of communications with the data controller (e.g. phone number, email, postal address etc.).

(b) id-dettalji ta’ kuntatt tal-uffiċjal tal-protezzjoni tad-data, fejn applikabbli;

(b) the contact details of the data protection officer, where applicable;

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN) Article 29 Working Party, Guidelines on Data Protection Officers (DPOs) (2017):

The contact details of the DPO should include information allowing data subjects and the supervisory authorities to reach the DPO in an easy way (a postal address, a dedicated telephone number, and/or a dedicated e-mail address). When appropriate, for purposes of communications with the public, other means of communications could also be provided, for example, a dedicated hotline, or a dedicated contact form addressed to the DPO on the organisation’s website.

Article 37(7) does not require that the published contact details should include the name of the DPO. Whilst it may be a good practice to do so, it is for the controller or the processor and the DPO to decide whether this is necessary or helpful in the particular circumstances.

[…]

As a matter of good practice, the WP29 also recommends that an organisation informs its employees of the name and contact details of the DPO. For example, the name and contact details of the DPO could be published internally on organisation’s intranet, internal telephone directory, and organisational charts.

(c) l-għanijiet tal-ipproċessar li għalihom hija maħsuba d-data personali kif ukoll il-bażi legali għall-ipproċessar;

(c) the purposes of the processing for which the personal data are intended as well as the legal basis for the processing;

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN) Article 29 Working Party, Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679, WP260 rev.01 (2018):

In addition to setting out the purposes of the processing for which the personal data is intended, the relevant legal basis relied upon under Article 6 must be specified. In the case of special categories of personal data, the relevant provision of Article 9 (and where relevant, the applicable Union or Member State law under which the data is processed) should be specified. Where, pursuant to Article 10, personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences or related security measures based on Article 6.1 is processed, where applicable the relevant Union or Member State law under which the processing is carried out should be specified.

(d) fejn l-ipproċessar ikun ibbażat fuq il-punt (f) tal-Artikolu 6(1), l-interessi leġittimi segwiti mill-kontrollur jew minn parti terza;

(d) where the processing is based on point (f) of Article 6(1), the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or by a third party;

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza Testi relatati

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN) Article 29 Working Party, Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679, WP260 rev.01 (2016):

The specific interest in question must be identified for the benefit of the data subject. As a matter of best practice, the controller can also provide the data subject with the information from the balancing test, which must be carried out to allow reliance on Article 6.1(f) as a lawful basis for processing, in advance of any collection of data subjects’ personal data. To avoid information fatigue, this can be included within a layered privacy statement/ notice (see paragraph 35). In any case, the WP29 position is that information to the data subject should make it clear that they can obtain information on the balancing test upon request. This is essential for effective transparency where data subjects have doubts as to whether the balancing test has been carried out fairly or they wish to file a complaint with a supervisory authority.

Testi relatati

Artikolu 6 RĠPD (GDPR). Legalità tal-ipproċessar

Article 6 GDPR. Lawfulness of processing

[…]

1. L-ipproċessar għandu jkun legali biss jekk u safejn mill-inqas ikun japplika wieħed mill-punti li ġejjin:

1. Processing shall be lawful only if and to the extent that at least one of the following applies:

[…]

(f) l-ipproċessar ikun meħtieġ għall-finijiet tal-interessi leġittimi segwiti mill-kontrollur jew minn parti terza, għajr meta dawn l-interessi jingħelbu mill-interessi jew id-drittijiet u l-libertajiet fundamentali tas-suġġett tad-data li jeħtieġu l-protezzjoni tad-data personali, b’mod partikolari meta s-suġġett tad-data jkun minorenni.

(f) processing is necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or by a third party, except where such interests are overridden by the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject which require protection of personal data, in particular where the data subject is a child.

(e) ir-riċevituri jew il-kategoriji ta’ riċevituri tad-data personali, jekk jeżistu;

(e) the recipients or categories of recipients of the personal data, if any;

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza Testi relatati

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN) Article 29 Working Party, Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679, WP260 rev.01 (2016):

The term “recipient” is defined in Article 4.9 as “a natural or legal person, public authority, agency or another body, to which the personal data are disclosed, whether a third party or not” [emphasis added]. As such, a recipient does not have to be a third party. Therefore, other data controllers, joint controllers and processors to whom data is transferred or disclosed are covered by the term “recipient” and information on such recipients should be provided in addition to information on third party recipients. The actual (named) recipients of the personal data, or the categories of recipients, must be provided. In accordance with the principle of fairness, controllers must provide information on the recipients that is most meaningful for data subjects. In practice, this will generally be the named recipients, so that data subjects know exactly who has their personal data. If controllers opt to provide the categories of recipients, the information should be as specific as possible by indicating the type of recipient (i.e. by reference to the activities it carries out), the industry, sector and sub-sector and the location of the recipients.

Testi relatati

Artikolu 4 RĠPD (GDPR). Definizzjonijiet

Article 4 GDPR. Definitions

Definizzjonijiet

Definitions

[…]

(9) “riċevitur” tfisser persuna fiżika jew ġuridika, awtorità pubblika, aġenzija jew korp ieħor, li lilha tiġi żvelata d-data personali, irrispettivament milli huwiex parti terza jew le. Madankollu, l-awtoritajiet pubbliċi li jistgħu jirċievu data personali fil-qafas ta’ inkjesta partikolari f’konformità mal-liġi tal-Unjoni jew ta’ Stat Membru m’għandhomx jitqiesu bħala riċevituri; l-ipproċessar ta’ dik id-data minn dawk l-awtoritajiet pubbliċi għandu jkun f’konformità mar-regoli ta’ protezzjoni tad-data applikabbli skont il-finijiet tal-ipproċessar;

(9) ‘recipient’ means a natural or legal person, public authority, agency or another body, to which the personal data are disclosed, whether a third party or not. However, public authorities which may receive personal data in the framework of a particular inquiry in accordance with Union or Member State law shall not be regarded as recipients; the processing of those data by those public authorities shall be in compliance with the applicable data protection rules according to the purposes of the processing;

[…]

(f) fejn applikabbli, il-fatt li l-kontrollur għandu l-ħsieb li jittrasferixxi data personali lejn pajjiż terz jew organizzazzjoni internazzjonali u l-eżistenza jew l-assenza ta’ deċiżjoni ta’ adegwatezza mill-Kummissjoni, jew fil-każ ta’ trasferimenti msemmija fl-Artikolu 46 jew 47, jew it-tieni subparagrafu tal-Artikolu 49(1), referenza għas-salvagwardji xierqa jew adatti u l-mezzi li bihom tinkiseb kopja tagħhom jew fejn dawn ikunu saru disponibbli.

(f) where applicable, the fact that the controller intends to transfer personal data to a third country or international organisation and the existence or absence of an adequacy decision by the Commission, or in the case of transfers referred to in Article 46 or 47, or the second subparagraph of Article 49(1), reference to the appropriate or suitable safeguards and the means by which to obtain a copy of them or where they have been made available.

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza Testi relatati

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN) Article 29 Working Party, Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679, WP260 rev.01 (2016):

The relevant GDPR article permitting the transfer and the corresponding mechanism (e.g. adequacy decision under Article 45/ binding corporate rules under Article 47/ standard data protection clauses under Article 46.2/ derogations and safeguards under Article 49 etc.) should be specified. Information on where and how the relevant document may be accessed or obtained should also be provided e.g. by providing a link to the mechanism used. In accordance with the principle of fairness, the information provided on transfers to third countries should be as meaningful as possible to data subjects; this will generally mean that the third countries be named.

Testi relatati

Artikolu 45 RĠPD (GDPR). Trasferimenti abbażi ta' deċiżjoni ta' adegwatezza

Article 45 GDPR. Transfers on the basis of an adequacy decision

Artikolu 47 RĠPD (GDPR). Regoli korporattivi vinkolanti

Article 47 GDPR. Binding corporate rules

Artikolu 46 RĠPD (GDPR). Trasferimenti soġġetti għal salvagwardji xierqa

Article 46 GDPR. Transfers subject to appropriate safeguards

[…]

2. Is-salvagwardji xierqa msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 jistgħu jkunu previsti, mingħajr ma jkun jinħtieġ ebda awtorizzazzjoni speċifika minn awtorità superviżorja, permezz ta’:

2. The appropriate safeguards referred to in paragraph 1 may be provided for, without requiring any specific authorisation from a supervisory authority, by:

(b) regoli korporattivi vinkolanti f’konformità mal-Artikolu 47;

(b) binding corporate rules in accordance with Article 47;

(c) klawżoli standard ta’ protezzjoni tad-data adottati mill-Kummissjoni f’konformità mal-proċedura ta’ eżami msemmija fl-Artikolu 93(2);

(c) standard data protection clauses adopted by the Commission in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(2);

[…]

Artikolu 49 RĠPD (GDPR). Derogi għal sitwazzjonijiet speċifiċi

Article 49 GDPR. Derogations for specific situations

1. Fin-nuqqas ta’ deċiżjoni dwar l-adegwatezza skont l-Artikolu 45(3), jew salvagwardji xierqa skont l-Artikolu 46, inklużi regoli korporattivi vinkolanti, trasferiment jew sett ta’ trasferimenti ta’ data personali lejn pajjiż terz jew organizzazzjoni internazzjonali għandu jseħħ biss b’waħda mill-kondizzjonijiet li ġejjin:

1. In the absence of an adequacy decision pursuant to Article 45(3), or of appropriate safeguards pursuant to Article 46, including binding corporate rules, a transfer or a set of transfers of personal data to a third country or an international organisation shall take place only on one of the following conditions:

[…]

Fejn trasferiment ma setgħax ikun ibbażat fuq dispożizzjoni fl-Artikoli 45 jew 46, inklużi d-dispożizzjonijiet dwar regoli korporattivi vinkolanti, u l-ebda waħda mid-derogi għal sitwazzjoni speċifika msemmija fl-ewwel subparagrafu ta’ dan il-paragrafu ma tkun applikabbli, it-trasferiment ma jkunx ripetittiv, jikkonċerna biss għadd limitat ta’ suġġetti tad-data, ikun meħtieġ għall-għanijiet ta’ interessi leġittimi konvinċenti mfittxija mill-kontrollur li ma jingħelbux mill-interessi jew id-drittijiet u l-libertajiet tas-suġġett tad-data, u l-kontrollur ikun ivvaluta ċ-ċirkostanzi kollha madwar it-trasferiment tad-data u abbażi ta’ dik il-valutazzjoni pprovda salvagwardji xierqa fir-rigward tal-protezzjoni tad-data personali. Il-kontrollur għandu jinforma lill-awtorità superviżorja bit-trasferiment. Il-kontrollur għandu, barra milli jipprovdi l-informazzjoni msemmija fl-Artikolu 13 u 14, jinforma lis-suġġett tad-data dwar it-trasferiment u dwar l-interessi leġittimi konvinċenti segwiti.

Where a transfer could not be based on a provision in Article 45 or 46, including the provisions on binding corporate rules, and none of the derogations for a specific situation referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph is applicable, a transfer to a third country or an international organisation may take place only if the transfer is not repetitive, concerns only a limited number of data subjects, is necessary for the purposes of compelling legitimate interests pursued by the controller which are not overridden by the interests or rights and freedoms of the data subject, and the controller has assessed all the circumstances surrounding the data transfer and has on the basis of that assessment provided suitable safeguards with regard to the protection of personal data. The controller shall inform the supervisory authority of the transfer. The controller shall, in addition to providing the information referred to in Articles 13 and 14, inform the data subject of the transfer and on the compelling legitimate interests pursued.

[…]

2. Minbarra l-informazzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1, il-kontrollur għandu, meta tinkiseb id-data personali, jipprovdi lis-suġġett tad-data l-informazzjoni ulterjuri li ġejja meħtieġa biex jiġi żgurat ipproċessar ġust u trasparenti:

2. In addition to the information referred to in paragraph 1, the controller shall, at the time when personal data are obtained, provide the data subject with the following further information necessary to ensure fair and transparent processing:

Premessi Testi relatati

Premessi

(61) L-informazzjoni fir-rigward tal-ipproċessar ta' data personali relatata mas-suġġett tad-data għandha tingħatalu meta tinġabar mis-suġġett tad-data, jew, fejn id-data personali tinkiseb minn sors ieħor, f'perijodu ta' żmien raġonevoli, skont iċ-ċirkostanzi tal-każ. Fejn id-data personali tista' tkun żvelata b'mod leġittimu lil riċevitur ieħor, is-suġġett tad-data għandu jkun informat meta d-data personali tkun żvelata għall-ewwel darba lir-riċevitur. Fejn il-kontrollur jkollu l-intenzjoni li jipproċessa d-data personali għal fini differenti minn dak li għalih tkun inġabret, il-kontrollur għandu jipprovdi lis-suġġett tad-data, qabel dak l-ipproċessar ulterjuri, b'informazzjoni dwar dak il-fini l-ieħor u informazzjoni meħtieġa oħra. Fejn il-oriġini tad-data personali ma setgħetx tingħata lis-suġġett tad-data peress li jkunu intużaw diversi sorsi, għandha tingħata informazzjoni ġenerali.

(61) The information in relation to the processing of personal data relating to the data subject should be given to him or her at the time of collection from the data subject, or, where the personal data are obtained from another source, within a reasonable period, depending on the circumstances of the case. Where personal data can be legitimately disclosed to another recipient, the data subject should be informed when the personal data are first disclosed to the recipient. Where the controller intends to process the personal data for a purpose other than that for which they were collected, the controller should provide the data subject prior to that further processing with information on that other purpose and other necessary information. Where the origin of the personal data cannot be provided to the data subject because various sources have been used, general information should be provided.

Testi relatati

Guidelines 4/2019 on Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default Version 2.0.

3.1 Transparency [24]

_{[24]Elaboration on how to understand the concept of transparency can be found in Article 29 Working Party. «Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679». WP 260 rev.01, 11 April 2018. ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=51025 — endorsed by the EDPB}

65. The controller must be clear and open with the data subject about how they will collect, use and share personal data. Transparency is about enabling data subjects to understand, and if necessary, make use of their rights in Articles 15 to 22. The principle is embedded in Articles 12, 13, 14 and 34. Measures and safeguards put in place to support the principle of transparency should also support the implementation of these Articles.

66. Key design and default elements for the principle of transparency may include:

•Clarity – Information shall be in clear and plain language, concise and intelligible.

•Semantics – Communication should have a clear meaning to the audience in question.

•Accessibility — Information shall be easily accessible for the data subject.

•Contextual – Information should be provided at the relevant time and in the appropriate form.

•Relevance – Information should be relevant and applicable to the specific data subject.

•Universal design – Information shall be accessible to all data subjects, include use of machine readable languages to facilitate and automate readability and clarity.

•Comprehensible – Data subjects should have a fair understanding of what they can expect with regards to the processing of their personal data, particularly when the data subjects are children or other vulnerable groups.

• Multi-channel – Information should be provided in different channels and media, not only the textual, to increase the probability for the information to effectively reach the data subject.

• Layered – The information should be layered in a manner that resolves the tension between completeness and understanding, while accounting for data subjects’ reasonable expectations.

(a) il-perijodu li matulu d-data personali tkun ser tinħażen, jew jekk dak ma jkunx possibbli, il-kriterji użati biex jiġi ddeterminat dak il-perijodu;

(a) the period for which the personal data will be stored, or if that is not possible, the criteria used to determine that period;

ISO 27701 Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

ISO 27701

(EN) ISO/IEC 27701, adopted in 2019, added additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers.

Here is the relevant paragraph to article 13(2)(a) GDPR:

7.4.7 Retention

Control

The organization should not retain PII for longer than is necessary for the purposes for which the PII is processed.

Implementation guidance

The organization should develop and maintain retention schedules for information it retains, taking into account the requirement to retain PII for no longer than is necessary.

(EN) […]

(EN) Sign in
to read the full text

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN) Article 29 Working Party, Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679, WP260 rev.01 (2016):

This is linked to the data minimisation requirement in Article 5.1(c) and storage limitation requirement in Article 5.1(e). The storage period (or criteria to determine it) may be dictated by factors such as statutory requirements or industry guidelines but should be phrased in a way that allows the data subject to assess, on the basis of his or her own situation, what the retention period will be for specific data/ purposes. It is not sufficient for the data controller to generically state that personal data will be kept as long as necessary for the legitimate purposes of the processing. Where relevant, the different storage periods should be stipulated for different categories of personal data and/or different processing purposes, including where appropriate, archiving periods.

EDPB, Guidelines on the use of location data and contact tracing tools in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak (2020):

Storage limitation should consider the true needs and the medical relevance (this may include epidemiology-motivated considerations like the incubation period,etc.) and personal data should be kept only for the duration of the COVID-19 crisis. Afterwards,as a general rule,all personal data should be erased or anonymised.

(b) l-eżistenza tad-dritt li jitlob mingħand il-kontrollur aċċess jew rettifika jew tħassir ta’ data personali jew restrizzjoni tal-ipproċessar rigward is-suġġett tad-data jew li joġġezzjona għall-ipproċessar kif ukoll id-dritt għall-portabbiltà tad-data;

(b) the existence of the right to request from the controller access to and rectification or erasure of personal data or restriction of processing concerning the data subject or to object to processing as well as the right to data portability;

ISO 27701 Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

ISO 27701

(EN) ISO/IEC 27701, adopted in 2019, added additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers.

Here is the relevant paragraphs to article 13(2)(b) GDPR:

7.3.5 Providing mechanism to object to PII processing

Control

The organization should provide a mechanism for PII principals to object to the processing of their PII.

Implementation guidance

Some jurisdictions provide PII principals with a right to object to the processing of their PII. Organizations subject to the legislation and/or regulation of such jurisdictions should ensure that they implement appropriate measures to enable PII principals to exercize this right.

(EN) […]

(EN) Sign in
to read the full text

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN) Article 29 Working Party, Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679, WP260 rev.01 (2016):

This information should be specific to the processing scenario and include a summary of what the right involves and how the data subject can take steps to exercise it and any limitations on the right. […] In particular, the right to object to processing must be explicitly brought to the data subject’s attention at the latest at the time of first communication with the data subject and must be presented clearly and separately from any other information.64 In relation to the right to portability, see WP29 Guidelines on the right to data portability.

(c) fejn l-ipproċessar ikun ibbażat fuq il-punt (a) tal-Artikolu 6(1) jew il-punt (a) tal-Artikolu 9(2), l-eżistenza tad-dritt li jiġi irtirat il-kunsens fi kwalunkwe ħin, mingħajr ma tiġi affettwata l-legalità tal-ipproċessar abbażi ta’ kunsens qabel l-irtirar tiegħu;

(c) where the processing is based on point (a) of Article 6(1) or point (a) of Article 9(2), the existence of the right to withdraw consent at any time, without affecting the lawfulness of processing based on consent before its withdrawal;

ISO 27701 Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza Testi relatati

ISO 27701

(EN) ISO/IEC 27701, adopted in 2019, added additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers.

Here is the relevant paragraph to article 13(2)(c) GDPR:

7.3.4 Providing mechanism to modify or withdraw consent

Control

The organization should provide a mechanism for PII principals to modify or withdraw their consent.

Implementation guidance

The organization should inform PII principals of their rights related to withdrawing consent (which may vary by jurisdiction) at any time, and provide the mechanism to do so.

(EN) […]

(EN) Sign in
to read the full text

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN) Article 29 Working Party, Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679, WP260 rev.01 (2016):

This information should include how consent may be withdrawn, taking into account that it should be as easy for a data subject to withdraw consent as to give it.

Testi relatati

Artikolu 6 RĠPD (GDPR). Legalità tal-ipproċessar

Article 6 GDPR. Lawfulness of processing

Legalità tal-ipproċessar

Lawfulness of processing

1. L-ipproċessar għandu jkun legali biss jekk u safejn mill-inqas ikun japplika wieħed mill-punti li ġejjin:

1. Processing shall be lawful only if and to the extent that at least one of the following applies:

(a) is-suġġett tad-data jkun ta l-kunsens għall-ipproċessar ta’ data personali tiegħu għal fini speċifiku wieħed jew aktar;

(a) the data subject has given consent to the processing of his or her personal data for one or more specific purposes;

[…]

Artikolu 9 RĠPD (GDPR). Ipproċessar ta' kategoriji speċjali ta' data personali

Article 9 GDPR. Processing of special categories of personal data

Ipproċessar ta’ kategoriji speċjali ta’ data personali

Processing of special categories of personal data

1. L-ipproċessar ta’ data personali, li jiżvela oriġini razzjali jew etnika, opinjonijiet politiċi, twemmin reliġjuż jew filosofiku, jew sħubija fi trade union, u l-ipproċessar ta’ data ġenetika, data bijometrika sabiex tidentifika b’mod uniku persuna fiżika, data dwar is-saħħa jew data dwar il-ħajja sesswali u l-orjentazzjoni sesswali ta’ persuna fiżika huma projbiti.

1. Processing of personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, or trade union membership, and the processing of genetic data, biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person, data concerning health or data concerning a natural person’s sex life or sexual orientation shall be prohibited.

2. Il-paragrafu 1 ma għandux japplika jekk japplika wieħed minn dawn li ġejjin:

2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply if one of the following applies:

(a) is-suġġett tad-data jkun ta kunsens espliċitu għall-ipproċessar ta’ dik id-data personali għal fini speċifiku wieħed jew aktar, għajr fejn il-liġi tal-Unjoni jew il-liġi ta’ Stat Membru tipprevedi li l-projbizzjoni msemmija fil-paragrafu 1 ma tistax titneħħa mis-suġġett tad-data;

(a) the data subject has given explicit consent to the processing of those personal data for one or more specified purposes, except where Union or Member State law provide that the prohibition referred to in paragraph 1 may not be lifted by the data subject;

[…]

Artikolu 7 RĠPD (GDPR). Kondizzjonijiet għal kunsens

Article 7 GDPR. Conditions for consent

Kondizzjonijiet għal kunsens

Conditions for consent

[…]

3. Is-suġġett tad-data għandu d-dritt li jirtira l-kunsens tiegħu fi kwalunkwe ħin. L-irtirar tal-kunsens ma għandux jaffettwa l-legalità tal-ipproċessar ibbażat fuq kunsens qabel ma dan jiġi rtirat. Qabel ma jagħti l-kunsens, is-suġġett tad-data għandu jiġi informat b’dan. Għandu jkun faċli li jiġi rtirat kunsens daqs kemm li dan jingħata.

3. The data subject shall have the right to withdraw his or her consent at any time. The withdrawal of consent shall not affect the lawfulness of processing based on consent before its withdrawal. Prior to giving consent, the data subject shall be informed thereof. It shall be as easy to withdraw as to give consent.

[…]

Guidelines 4/2019 on Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default Version 2.0.

3.2 Lawfulness

67. The controller must identify a valid legal basis for the processing of personal data. Measures and safeguards should support the requirement to make sure that the whole processing lifecycle is in line with the relevant legal grounds of processing.

(d) id-dritt li jitressaq ilment quddiem awtorità superviżorja;

(d) the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority;

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza Testi relatati

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN) Article 29 Working Party, Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679, WP260 rev.01 (2016):

This information should explain that, in accordance with Article 77, a data subject has the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority, in particular in the Member State of his or her habitual residence, place of work or of an alleged infringement of the GDPR.

Testi relatati

Artikolu 77 RĠPD (GDPR). Dritt li jitressaq ilment quddiem awtorità superviżorja

Article 77 GDPR. Right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority

Dritt li jitressaq ilment quddiem awtorità superviżorja

Right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority

1. Mingħajr preġudizzju għal kwalunkwe rimedju amministrattiv jew ġudizzjarju ieħor, kull suġġett tad-data għandu d-dritt li jressaq ilment quddiem awtorità superviżorja, b’mod partikolari fl-Istat Membru tar-residenza abitwali tiegħu, il-post tax-xogħol tiegħu jew il-post tal-ksur allegat, jekk is-suġġett tad-data jqis li l-ipproċessar ta’ data personali dwaru jikser dan ir-Regolament.

1. Without prejudice to any other administrative or judicial remedy, every data subject shall have the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority, in particular in the Member State of his or her habitual residence, place of work or place of the alleged infringement if the data subject considers that the processing of personal data relating to him or her infringes this Regulation.

2. L-awtorità superviżorja li magħha jkun sar l-ilment għandha tinforma lill-ilmentatur dwar il-progress u l-eżitu tal-ilment inkluża l-possibbiltà ta’ rimedju ġudizzjarju skont l-Artikolu 78.

2. The supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged shall inform the complainant on the progress and the outcome of the complaint including the possibility of a judicial remedy pursuant to Article 78.

(e) jekk il-forniment ta’ data personali huwiex rekwiżit statutorju jew kuntrattwali, jew rekwiżit meħtieġ biex wieħed jidħol f’kuntratt, kif ukoll jekk is-suġġett tad-data huwiex obbligat jipprovdi d-data personali u l-konsegwenzi possibbli meta wieħed jonqos milli jipprovdi tali data;

(e) whether the provision of personal data is a statutory or contractual requirement, or a requirement necessary to enter into a contract, as well as whether the data subject is obliged to provide the personal data and of the possible consequences of failure to provide such data;

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN) Article 29 Working Party, Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679, WP260 rev.01 (2016):

For example in an employment context, it may be a contractual requirement to provide certain information to a current or prospective employer. Online forms should clearly identify which fields are “required”, which are not, and what will be the consequences of not filling in the required fields.

(f) l-eżistenza ta’ teħid awtomatizzat ta’ deċiżjonijiet inkluż it-tfassil ta’ profili msemmi fl-Artikolu 22(1) u (4) u għall-inqas f’dawk il-każijiet, l-informazzjoni importanti dwar il-loġika involuta, kif ukoll is-sinifikat u l-konsegwenzi previsti ta’ tali pproċessar għas-suġġett tad-data.

(f) the existence of automated decision-making, including profiling, referred to in Article 22(1) and (4) and, at least in those cases, meaningful information about the logic involved, as well as the significance and the envisaged consequences of such processing for the data subject.

ISO 27701 Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza Testi relatati

ISO 27701

(EN) ISO/IEC 27701, adopted in 2019, added additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers.

Here is the relevant paragraph to article 13(2)(f) GDPR:

7.3.10 Automated decision making

Control

The organization should identify and address obligations, including legal obligations, to the PII principals resulting from decisions made by the organization which are related to the PII principal based solely on automated processing of PII.

(EN) […]

(EN) Sign in
to read the full text

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN) Article 29 Working Party, Guidelines on Automated individual decision-making and Profiling for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679 (wp251rev.01) (2018):

Given the core principle of transparency underpinning the GDPR, controllers must ensure they explain clearly and simply to individuals how the profiling or automated decision-making process works.
In particular, where the processing involves profiling-based decision making (irrespective of whether it is caught by Article 22 provisions), then the fact that the processing is for the purposes of both (a) profiling and (b) making a decision based on the profile generated, must be made clear to the data subject.

Recital 60 states that giving information about profiling is part of the controller’s transparency obligations under Article 5(1) (a). The data subject has a right to be informed by the controller about and, in certain circumstances, a right to object to ‘profiling’, regardless of whether solely automated individual decision-making based on profiling takes place.

EDPB, Guidelines 8/2020 on the targeting of social media users (2020).

Testi relatati

Artikolu 22 RĠPD (GDPR). Teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet individwali awtomatizzati, inkluż tfassil ta' profili

Article 22 GDPR. Automated individual decision-making, including profiling

1. Is-suġġett tad-data għandu d-dritt li ma jkunx soġġett għal deċiżjoni bbażata unikament fuq ipproċessar awtomatizzat, inkluż it-tfassil ta’ profili, li jipproduċi effetti legali li jikkonċernaw lilu jew li bl-istess mod jaffettwa lilu b’mod sinifikanti.

1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her.

[…]

4. Id-deċiżjonijiet imsemmija fil-paragrafu 2 ma għandhomx ikunu bbażati fuq kategoriji speċjali ta’ data personali msemmija fl-Artikolu 9(1), sakemm ma japplikax il-punt (a) jew (g) tal-Artikolu 9(2) u ma jkunux fis-seħħ miżuri biex jiġu salvagwardati d-drittijiet u l-libertajiet u l-interessi leġittimi tas-suġġett tad-data.

4. Decisions referred to in paragraph 2 shall not be based on special categories of personal data referred to in Article 9(1), unless point (a) or (g) of Article 9(2) applies and suitable measures to safeguard the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests are in place.

3. Fejn il-kontrollur ikollu l-intenzjoni li jipproċessa d-data personali ulterjorment għal fini differenti minn dak li għalih tkun inġabret id-data personali, il-kontrollur għandu jipprovdi lis-suġġett tad-data, qabel dak l-ipproċessar ulterjuri, b’informazzjoni dwar dak il-fini l-ieħor u kwalunkwe informazzjoni ulterjuri rilevanti kif imsemmi fil-paragrafu 2.

3. Where the controller intends to further process the personal data for a purpose other than that for which the personal data were collected, the controller shall provide the data subject prior to that further processing with information on that other purpose and with any relevant further information as referred to in paragraph 2.

ISO 27701

(EN) ISO/IEC 27701, adopted in 2019, added additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers.

Here is the relevant paragraph to article 13(3) GDPR:

7.3.3 Providing information to PII principals

Control

The organization should provide PII principals with clear and easily accessible information identifying the PII controller and describing the processing of their PII.

Implementation guidance

The organization should provide the information detailed in 7.3.2 to PII principals in a timely, concise, complete, transparent, intelligible and easily accessible form, using clear and plain language, as appropriate to the target audience.

(EN) […]

(EN) Sign in
to read the full text

4. Il-paragrafi 1, 2 u 3 ma għandhomx japplikaw meta u sa fejn is-suġġett tad-data diġà jkollu l-informazzjoni.

4. Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall not apply where and insofar as the data subject already has the information.

Regolament Ġenerali dwar il-Protezzjoni tad-Data (RĠPD, GDPR)

General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR)

The latest consolidated version of the Regulation with corrections by Corrigendum, OJ L 127, 23.5.2018, p. 2 ((EU) 2016/679). Source: EUR-lex.

Kummentarju ISO 27701 Premessi Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza Ħalli kumment

Kummentarju

(EN) To facilitate the work of our consultants, we have collected all the requirements and information that have to be mentioned and created a convenient checklist. Next to each paragraph, we have placed links to specific GDPR articles and guidelines. We grouped all the information into 7 sections:

Controller’s identity
Purpose and lawful basis for processing
Personal data
Transfers of data to third countries
Rights
Changes (in privacy notices)
Form (of information provided)

It looks like this:

(EN) […]

(EN) Sign in
to read the full text

(EN) Author

(EN) Siarhei Varankevich CIPP/E, CIPM, CIPT, MBA, FIP

(EN) Co-Founder & CEO of Data Privacy Office LLC. Data Protection Trainer and Principal Consultant

(EN) Ask a question

(EN)

Data Subject Request Letter Sample

Concern: Request of information regarding my personal data

Dear Madam, Dear Sir,

I have a right to be informed, under Article 13 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), about personal data concerning me that you are processing…

(EN) […]

(EN) Sign in
to read the full text

(EN) Author

(EN) Louis-Philippe Gratton PhD, LLM

(EN) Privacy Expert

(EN) Ask a question

ISO 27701

(EN) ISO/IEC 27701, adopted in 2019, added additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers.

Here is the relevant paragraph to article 13 GDPR:

7.3.2 Determining information for PII principals

Control

The organization should determine and document the information to be provided to PII principals regarding the processing of their PII and the timing of such a provision.

Implementation guidance

The organization should determine the legal, regulatory and/or business requirements for when information is to be provided to the PII principal (e.g. prior to processing, within a certain time from when it is requested, etc.) and for the type of information to be provided.

(EN) […]

(EN) Sign in
to read the full text

Premessi

(62) Madankollu, mhuwiex meħtieġ li l-obbligu li tiġi provduta informazzjoni jiġi impost fejn is-suġġett tad-data diġà jkollu l-informazzjoni, fejn ir-reġistrazzjoni jew l-iżvelar tad-data personali tkun espressament stabbilita bil-liġi, jew fejn l-għoti tal-informazzjoni lis-suġġett tad-data tirriżulta impossibbli jew tinvolvi sforz sproporzjonat. Dan tal-aħħar jista' jkun il-każ partikolarment fejn l-ipproċessar isir għal finijiet ta' arkivjar fl-interess pubbliku, għal finijiet ta' riċerka xjentifika jew storika jew għal finijiet ta' statistika. F'dak ir-rigward, għandhom jiġu kkunsidrati l-għadd ta' suġġetti tad-data, l-età tad-data, u kwalunkwe salvagwardja adatta adottati.

(62) However, it is not necessary to impose the obligation to provide information where the data subject already possesses the information, where the recording or disclosure of the personal data is expressly laid down by law or where the provision of information to the data subject proves to be impossible or would involve a disproportionate effort. The latter could in particular be the case where processing is carried out for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes. In that regard, the number of data subjects, the age of the data and any appropriate safeguards adopted should be taken into consideration.

(63) Suġġett tad-data għandu jkollu d-dritt ta' aċċess għal data li tkun inġabret dwaru, u li jeżerċita dak id-dritt faċilment u f'intervalli raġonevoli, sabiex ikun jaf dwar, u jivverifika, il-legalità tal-ipproċessar. Dan jinkludi d-dritt tas-suġġetti tad-data li jkollhom aċċess għad-data dwar saħħithom, pereżempju d-data fir-reġistri mediċi tagħhom li jkun fihom informazzjoni bħal dijanjosi, riżultati ta' eżamijiet, valutazzjonijiet mit-tobba li qed jittrattawhom u kwalunkwe kura jew intervent ipprovdut. Kull suġġett tad-data għandu għalhekk ikollu d-dritt li jkun jaf u jikseb komunikazzjoni b'mod partikolari fir-rigward tal-għanijiet li għalihom tkun qiegħda tiġi pproċessata d-data personali, fejn possibbli il-perijodu li għalih id-data personali tiġi pproċessata, ir-riċevituri tad-data personali, il-loġika involuta fi kwalunkwe pproċessar awtomatiku tad-data personali u, għallinqas meta bbażata fuq it-tfassil ta' profili, il-konsegwenzi ta' dan l-ipproċessar. Fejn possibbli, il-kontrollur għandu jkun jista' jipprovdi aċċess mill-bogħod għal sistema sikura li tipprovdi lis-suġġett tad-data b'aċċess dirett għad-data personali tiegħu. Dak id-dritt ma għandux jaffettwa negattivament id-drittijiet jew il-libertajiet ta' persuni oħrajn, inklużi sigrieti tan-negozju jew proprjetà intellettwali u b'mod partikolari d-dritt tal-awtur li jipproteġi s-software. Madankollu, ir-riżultat ta' dawn il-kunsiderazzjonijiet m'għandux ikun rifjut li tiġi provduta l-informazzjoni kollha lis-suġġett tad-data. Fejn il-kontrollur jipproċessa kwantità kbira ta' informazzjoni rigward is-suġġett tad-data, il-kontrollur għandu jkun jista' jitlob li qabel ma tingħata din l-informazzjoni, is-suġġett tad-data jispeċifika l-informazzjoni jew l-attivitajiet ta' pproċessar li għalihom tkun tirreferi t-talba.

(63) A data subject should have the right of access to personal data which have been collected concerning him or her, and to exercise that right easily and at reasonable intervals, in order to be aware of, and verify, the lawfulness of the processing. This includes the right for data subjects to have access to data concerning their health, for example the data in their medical records containing information such as diagnoses, examination results, assessments by treating physicians and any treatment or interventions provided. Every data subject should therefore have the right to know and obtain communication in particular with regard to the purposes for which the personal data are processed, where possible the period for which the personal data are processed, the recipients of the personal data, the logic involved in any automatic personal data processing and, at least when based on profiling, the consequences of such processing. Where possible, the controller should be able to provide remote access to a secure system which would provide the data subject with direct access to his or her personal data. That right should not adversely affect the rights or freedoms of others, including trade secrets or intellectual property and in particular the copyright protecting the software. However, the result of those considerations should not be a refusal to provide all information to the data subject. Where the controller processes a large quantity of information concerning the data subject, the controller should be able to request that, before the information is delivered, the data subject specify the information or processing activities to which the request relates.

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN)