Artikolu 60 📖 RĠPD (GDPR). Kooperazzjoni bejn l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati oħra

Artikolu 60 RĠPD (GDPR). Kooperazzjoni bejn l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati oħra

Article 60 GDPR. Cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned

1. L-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija għandha tikkoopera mal-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati l-oħra f’konformità ma’ dan l-Artikolu fi sforz biex jintlaħaq kunsens. L-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati għandhom jiskambjaw l-informazzjoni rilevanti kollha bejniethom.

1. The lead supervisory authority shall cooperate with the other supervisory authorities concerned in accordance with this Article in an endeavour to reach consensus. The lead supervisory authority and the supervisory authorities concerned shall exchange all relevant information with each other.

2. L-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija tista’ titlob fi kwalunkwe ħin lil awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati oħra biex jipprovdu assistenza reċiproka skont l-Artikolu 61 u tista’ twettaq operazzjonijiet konġunti skont l-Artikolu 62, b’mod partikolari għat-twettiq ta’ investigazzjonijiet jew għall-monitoraġġ tal-implimentazzjoni ta’ miżura li tikkonċerna kontrollur jew proċessur stabbilit fi Stat Membru ieħor.

2. The lead supervisory authority may request at any time other supervisory authorities concerned to provide mutual assistance pursuant to Article 61 and may conduct joint operations pursuant to Article 62, in particular for carrying out investigations or for monitoring the implementation of a measure concerning a controller or processor established in another Member State.

Testi relatati

Artikolu 61 RĠPD (GDPR). Assistenza reċiproka

Article 61 GDPR. Mutual assistance

Artikolu 62 RĠPD (GDPR). Operazzjonijiet konġunti ta' awtoritajiet superviżorji

Article 62 GDPR. Joint operations of supervisory authorities

3. L-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija għandha, mingħajr dewmien, tikkomunika l-informazzjoni rilevanti dwar il-kwistjoni lill-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati l-oħra. Hija għandha tissottometti mingħajr dewmien abbozz ta’ deċiżjoni lill-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati l-oħra għall-opinjoni tagħhom u tieħu kont tal-fehmiet tagħhom.

3. The lead supervisory authority shall, without delay, communicate the relevant information on the matter to the other supervisory authorities concerned. It shall without delay submit a draft decision to the other supervisory authorities concerned for their opinion and take due account of their views.

4. Fejn kwalunkwe mill-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati l-oħra f’perijodu ta’ żmien ta’ erba’ ġimgħat wara li tkun ġiet ikkonsultata f’konformità mal-paragrafu 3 ta’ dan l-Artikolu, tesprimi oġġezzjoni rilevanti u motivata għall-abbozz ta’ deċiżjoni, l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija għandha, jekk ma ssegwix l-oġġezzjoni rilevanti u motivata jew tkun tal-fehma li l-oġġezzjoni mhijiex rilevanti jew motivata, tissottometti l-kwistjoni lill-mekkaniżmu ta’ konsistenza msemmi fl-Artikolu 63.

4. Where any of the other supervisory authorities concerned within a period of four weeks after having been consulted in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article, expresses a relevant and reasoned objection to the draft decision, the lead supervisory authority shall, if it does not follow the relevant and reasoned objection or is of the opinion that the objection is not relevant or reasoned, submit the matter to the consistency mechanism referred to in Article 63.

Testi relatati

Artikolu 63 RĠPD (GDPR). Mekkaniżmu ta' konsistenza

Article 63 GDPR. Consistency mechanism

5. Fejn l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija biħsiebha ssegwi l-oġġezzjoni rilevanti u motivata li saret, għandha tissottometti abbozz rivedut ta’ deċiżjoni lill-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati l-oħra għall-opinjoni tagħhom. Dak l-abbozz rivedut ta’ deċiżjoni għandu jkun soġġett għall-proċedura msemmija fil-paragrafu 4 f’perijodu ta’ żmien ta’ ġimagħtejn.

5. Where the lead supervisory authority intends to follow the relevant and reasoned objection made, it shall submit to the other supervisory authorities concerned a revised draft decision for their opinion. That revised draft decision shall be subject to the procedure referred to in paragraph 4 within a period of two weeks.

6. Fejn l-ebda waħda mill-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati l-oħra ma tkun oġġezzjonat għall-abbozz ta’ deċiżjoni sottomess mill-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija fil-perijodu msemmi fil-paragrafi 4 u 5, l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati għandhom jitqiesu li qed jaqblu ma’ dak l-abbozz ta’ deċiżjoni u għandhom ikunu marbuta bih.

6. Where none of the other supervisory authorities concerned has objected to the draft decision submitted by the lead supervisory authority within the period referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5, the lead supervisory authority and the supervisory authorities concerned shall be deemed to be in agreement with that draft decision and shall be bound by it.

7. L-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija għandha tadotta u tinnotifika d-deċiżjoni lill-istabbiliment ewlieni jew l-istabbiliment uniku tal-kontrollur jew il-proċessur, skont kif ikun il-każ, u tinforma l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati l-oħra u lill-Bord dwar id-deċiżjoni inkwistjoni inkluż ġabra fil-qosor tal-fatti u r-raġunijiet rilevanti. L-awtorità superviżorja li quddiemha jitressaq ilment għandha tinforma lill-ilmentatur bid-deċiżjoni.

7. The lead supervisory authority shall adopt and notify the decision to the main establishment or single establishment of the controller or processor, as the case may be and inform the other supervisory authorities concerned and the Board of the decision in question, including a summary of the relevant facts and grounds. The supervisory authority with which a complaint has been lodged shall inform the complainant on the decision.

ISO 27701 Testi relatati

ISO 27701

Testi relatati

Guidelines 3/2018 on the territorial scope of the GDPR (Article 3)

“An establishment in the Union”

The threshold for “stable arrangement [9]” can actually be quite low when the centre of activities of a controller concerns the provision of services online. As a result, in some circumstances, the presence of one single employee or agent of a non-EU entity in the Union may be sufficient to constitute a stable arrangement (amounting to an ‘establishment’ for the purposes of Art 3(1)) if that employee or agent acts with a sufficient degree of stability. Conversely, when an employee is based in the EU but the processing is not being carried out in the context of the activities of the EU-based employee in the Union (i.e. the processing relates to activities of the controller outside the EU), the mere presence of an employee in the EU will not result in that processing falling within the scope of the GDPR. In other words, the mere presence of an employee in the EU is not as such sufficient to trigger the application of the GDPR, since for the processing in question to fall within the scope of the GDPR, it must also be carried out in the context of the activities of the EU-based employee.

_{[9] Weltimmo, paragraph 31.}

The fact that the non-EU entity responsible for the data processing does not have a branch or subsidiary in a Member State does not preclude it from having an establishment there within the meaning of EU data protection law. Although the notion of establishment is broad, it is not without limits. It is not possible to conclude that the non-EU entity has an establishment in the Union merely because the undertaking’s website is accessible in the Union [10].

_{[10] CJEU, Verein für Konsumenteninformation v. Amazon EU Sarl, Case C‑191/15, 28 July 2016, paragraph 76 (hereafter “Verein für Konsumenteninformation”).}

8. B’deroga mill-paragrafu 7, fejn ilment jitwarrab jew jiġi miċħud, l-awtorità superviżorja li quddiemha tressaq l-ilment għandha tadotta d-deċiżjoni u tinnotifikaha lill-ilmentatur u għandha tinforma lill-kontrollur b’din.

8. By derogation from paragraph 7, where a complaint is dismissed or rejected, the supervisory authority with which the complaint was lodged shall adopt the decision and notify it to the complainant and shall inform the controller thereof.

9. Fejn l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati jaqblu li jwarrbu jew jiċħdu partijiet ta’ lment u li jieħdu azzjoni dwar partijiet oħra ta’ dak l-ilment, għandha tiġi adottata deċiżjoni separata għal kull waħda minn dawk il-partijiet tal-kwistjoni. L-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija għandha tadotta d-deċiżjoni għall-parti li tikkonċerna azzjonijiet b’rabta mal-kontrollur, għandha tinnotifikaha lill-istabbiliment ewlieni jew l-istabbiliment uniku tal-kontrollur jew il-proċessur fit-territorju tal-Istat Membru tiegħu u għandha tinforma lill-ilmentatur b’dan, waqt li l-awtorità superviżorja tal-ilmentatur għandha tadotta d-deċiżjoni għall-parti li tikkonċerna t-twarrib jew iċ-ċaħda ta’ dak l-ilment, u għandha tinnotifikaha lil dak l-ilmentatur u għandha tinforma lill-kontrollur jew il-proċessur b’dan.

9. Where the lead supervisory authority and the supervisory authorities concerned agree to dismiss or reject parts of a complaint and to act on other parts of that complaint, a separate decision shall be adopted for each of those parts of the matter. The lead supervisory authority shall adopt the decision for the part concerning actions in relation to the controller, shall notify it to the main establishment or single establishment of the controller or processor on the territory of its Member State and shall inform the complainant thereof, while the supervisory authority of the complainant shall adopt the decision for the part concerning dismissal or rejection of that complaint, and shall notify it to that complainant and shall inform the controller or processor thereof.

10. Wara li jkun ġie notifikat bid-deċiżjoni tal-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija skont il-paragrafi 7 u 9, il-kontrollur jew il-proċessur għandu jieħu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex tiġi żgurata konformità mad-deċiżjoni fir-rigward tal-attivitajiet ta’ pproċessar fil-kuntest tal-istabbilimenti kollha tiegħu fl-Unjoni. Il-kontrollur jew il-proċessur għandu jinnotifika l-miżuri meħuda għall-konformità mad-deċiżjoni lill-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija, li għandha tinforma lill-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati l-oħra.

10. After being notified of the decision of the lead supervisory authority pursuant to paragraphs 7 and 9, the controller or processor shall take the necessary measures to ensure compliance with the decision as regards processing activities in the context of all its establishments in the Union. The controller or processor shall notify the measures taken for complying with the decision to the lead supervisory authority, which shall inform the other supervisory authorities concerned.

11. Fejn, f’ċirkostanzi eċċezzjonali, awtorità superviżorja kkonċernata jkollha raġunijiet biex tqis li hemm ħtieġa urġenti li taġixxi sabiex tipproteġi l-interessi ta’ suġġetti tad-data, għandha tapplika l-proċedura ta’ urġenza msemmija fl-Artikolu 66.

11. Where, in exceptional circumstances, a supervisory authority concerned has reasons to consider that there is an urgent need to act in order to protect the interests of data subjects, the urgency procedure referred to in Article 66 shall apply.

Testi relatati

Artikolu 66 RĠPD (GDPR). Proċedura ta' urġenza

Article 66 GDPR. Urgency procedure

12. L-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati l-oħra għandhom jipprovdu l-informazzjoni meħtieġa taħt dan l-Artikolu lil xulxin b’mezzi elettroniċi, bl-użu ta’ format standardizzat.

12. The lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned shall supply the information required under this Article to each other by electronic means, using a standardised format.

Regolament Ġenerali dwar il-Protezzjoni tad-Data (RĠPD, GDPR)

General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR)

The latest consolidated version of the Regulation with corrections by Corrigendum, OJ L 127, 23.5.2018, p. 2 ((EU) 2016/679). Source: EUR-lex.

Premessi Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza Ħalli kumment

Premessi

(124) Fejn l-ipproċessar ta' data personali jsir fil-kuntest tal-attivitajiet ta' stabbiliment ta' kontrollur jew proċessur fl-Unjoni u l-kontrollur jew il-proċessur ikun stabbilit f'iktar minn Stat Membru wieħed, jew fejn l-ipproċessar isir fil-kuntest tal-attivitajiet ta' stabbiliment uniku ta' kontrollur jew proċessur fl-Unjoni, u dan jaffettwa b'mod sostanzjali lil suġġetti tad-data f'aktar minn Stat Membru wieħed, jew x'aktarx li ser jaffettwawhom b'mod sostanzjali, l-awtorità superviżorja għall-istabbiliment ewlieni tal-kontrollur jew il-proċessur jew għall-istabbiliment uniku tal-kontrollur jew il-proċessur għandha taġixxi bħala awtorità ewlenija. Hija għandha tikkoopera mal-awtoritajiet l-oħrajn ikkonċernati, peress li l-kontrollur jew proċessur ikollu stabbiliment fit-territorju tal-Istat Membru tagħhom, peress li s-suġġetti tad-data jkunu residenti fit-territorju tagħhom ikunu affettwati b'mod sostanzjali, jew peress li jkun sar ilment lilhom. Anke fejn isuġġett tad-data li ma jkunx residenti f'dak l-Istat Membru ikun ressaq ilment, l-awtorità superviżorja li quddiemha jkun tressaq dan l-ilment għandha wkoll tkun awtorità superviżorja kkonċernata. Fl-ambitu tal-kompiti tiegħu li joħroġ linji gwida dwar kwalunkwe kwistjoni li tkopri l-applikazzjoni ta' dan ir-Regolament, il-Bord għandu jkun jista' joħroġ linji gwida b'mod partikolari dwar il-kriterji li għandhom jitqiesu sabiex jiġi ddeterminat jekk l-ipproċessar inkwistjoni jaffettwax b'mod sostanzjali lil suġġetti tad-data f'aktar minn Stat Membru wieħed u dwar x'jikkostitwixxi oġġezzjoni rilevanti u motivata.

(124) Where the processing of personal data takes place in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the Union and the controller or processor is established in more than one Member State, or where processing taking place in the context of the activities of a single establishment of a controller or processor in the Union substantially affects or is likely to substantially affect data subjects in more than one Member State, the supervisory authority for the main establishment of the controller or processor or for the single establishment of the controller or processor should act as lead authority. It should cooperate with the other authorities concerned, because the controller or processor has an establishment on the territory of their Member State, because data subjects residing on their territory are substantially affected, or because a complaint has been lodged with them. Also where a data subject not residing in that Member State has lodged a complaint, the supervisory authority with which such complaint has been lodged should also be a supervisory authority concerned. Within its tasks to issue guidelines on any question covering the application of this Regulation, the Board should be able to issue guidelines in particular on the criteria to be taken into account in order to ascertain whether the processing in question substantially affects data subjects in more than one Member State and on what constitutes a relevant and reasoned objection.

(125) L-awtorità ewlenija għandu jkollha l-kompetenza li tadotta deċiżjonijiet vinkolanti dwar miżuri li japplikaw is-setgħat mogħtija lilha f'konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament. Fil-kapaċità tagħha bħala awtorità ewlenija, l-awtorità superviżorja għandha tinvolvi l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati mill-qrib u tikkoordinahom fil-proċess tat-teħid tad-deċiżjonijiet. Fejn id-deċiżjoni tkun li l-ilment tas-suġġett tad-data jinċaħad kompletament jew parzjalment, dik id-deċiżjoni għandha tiġi adottata mill-awtorità superviżorja li magħha jkun sar l-ilment.

(125) The lead authority should be competent to adopt binding decisions regarding measures applying the powers conferred on it in accordance with this Regulation. In its capacity as lead authority, the supervisory authority should closely involve and coordinate the supervisory authorities concerned in the decision-making process. Where the decision is to reject the complaint by the data subject in whole or in part, that decision should be adopted by the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged.

(126) Id-deċiżjoni għandha tiġi maqbula b'mod konġunt mill-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u l-awtoritajiet superviżorji kkonċernati u għandha tiġi diretta lejn l-istabbiliment ewlieni jew uniku tal-kontrollur jew il-proċessur u għandha torbot lill-kontrollur u lill-proċessur. Il-kontrollur jew il-proċessur għandu jieħu l-miżuri meħtieġa biex jiżgura l-konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament u l-implimentazzjoni tad-deċiżjoni li tiġi nnotifikata mill-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija lill-istabbiliment ewlieni tal-kontrollur jew il-proċessur fir-rigward tal-attivitajiet ta' pproċessar fl-Unjoni.

(126) The decision should be agreed jointly by the lead supervisory authority and the supervisory authorities concerned and should be directed towards the main or single establishment of the controller or processor and be binding on the controller and processor. The controller or processor should take the necessary measures to ensure compliance with this Regulation and the implementation of the decision notified by the lead supervisory authority to the main establishment of the controller or processor as regards the processing activities in the Union.

(127) Kull awtorità superviżorja li ma tkunx qed taġixxi bħala l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija għandha tkun kompetenti li tittratta każijiet lokali fejn il-kontrollur jew il-proċessur ikun stabbilit f'aktar minn Stat Membru wieħed, iżda s-suġġett tal-ipproċessar speċifiku jikkonċerna biss l-ipproċessar li jsir fi Stat Membru uniku u jinvolvi biss is-suġġetti tad-data f'dak l-Istat Membru uniku, pereżempju, fejn is-suġġett jikkonċerna l-ipproċessar ta' data personali tal-impjegati fil-kuntest speċifiku tal-impjiegi ta' Stat Membru partikolari. F'tali każijiet, l-awtorità superviżorja għandha tgħarraf lill-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija mingħajr dewmien dwar il-kwistjoni. Wara li tiġi infurmata, l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija għandha tiddeċiedi jekk hijiex ser tittratta l-każ skont id-dispożizzjoni dwar il-kooperazzjoni bejn l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u awtoritajiet superviżorja oħra kkonċernati (“il-mekkaniżmu ta' punt uniku ta' servizz”), jew jekk l-awtorità superviżorja li infurmatha għandhiex tittratta l-każ fil-livell lokali. Meta tkun qed tiddeċiedi jekk hijiex ser tittratta l-każ, l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija għandha tqis jekk hemmx stabbiliment tal-kontrollur jew il-proċessur fl-Istat Membru tal-awtorità superviżorja li informatha sabiex tiżgura l-infurzar effettiv ta' deċiżjoni vis-à-vis il-kontrollur jew il-proċessur. Fejn l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija tiddeċiedi li tittratta l-każ, l-awtorità superviżorja li tkun infurmatha għandu jkollha l-possibbiltà li tippreżenta abbozz għal deċiżjoni, li l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija għandha tqis bl-akbar reqqa meta tkun qed tħejji l-abbozz ta' deċiżjoni tagħha f'dak il-mekkaniżmu ta' punt uniku ta' servizz.

(127) Each supervisory authority not acting as the lead supervisory authority should be competent to handle local cases where the controller or processor is established in more than one Member State, but the subject matter of the specific processing concerns only processing carried out in a single Member State and involves only data subjects in that single Member State, for example, where the subject matter concerns the processing of employees' personal data in the specific employment context of a Member State. In such cases, the supervisory authority should inform the lead supervisory authority without delay about the matter. After being informed, the lead supervisory authority should decide, whether it will handle the case pursuant to the provision on cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and other supervisory authorities concerned (‘one-stop-shop mechanism’), or whether the supervisory authority which informed it should handle the case at local level. When deciding whether it will handle the case, the lead supervisory authority should take into account whether there is an establishment of the controller or processor in the Member State of the supervisory authority which informed it in order to ensure effective enforcement of a decision vis-à-vis the controller or processor. Where the lead supervisory authority decides to handle the case, the supervisory authority which informed it should have the possibility to submit a draft for a decision, of which the lead supervisory authority should take utmost account when preparing its draft decision in that one-stop-shop mechanism.

(128) Ir-regoli dwar l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija u l-mekkaniżmu ta' punt uniku ta' servizz ma għandhomx japplikaw fejn l-ipproċessar isir minn awtoritajiet pubbliċi jew korpi privati fl-interess pubbliku. F'dawn il-każijiet, l-unika awtorità superviżorja li jkollha l-kompetenza biex teżerċita s-setgħat li tingħata f'konformità ma' dan ir-Regolament għandha tkun l-awtorità superviżorja tal-Istat Membru fejn tkun stabbilita l-awtorità pubblika jew il-korp privat.

(128) The rules on the lead supervisory authority and the one-stop-shop mechanism should not apply where the processing is carried out by public authorities or private bodies in the public interest. In such cases the only supervisory authority competent to exercise the powers conferred to it in accordance with this Regulation should be the supervisory authority of the Member State where the public authority or private body is established.

(130) Fejn l-awtorità superviżorja li quddiemha jkun tressaq l-ilment ma tkunx l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija, l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija għandha tikkoopera mill-qrib mal-awtorità superviżorja li quddiemha jkun tressaq l-ilment skont id-dispożizzjonijiet dwar kooperazzjoni u konsistenza, stipulati f'dan ir-Regolament. F'dawn il-każijiet, meta l-awtorità superviżorja ewlenija tieħu miżuri maħsubin biex jipproduċu effetti legali, inkluż l-impożizzjoni ta' multi amministrattivi, din għandha tikkunsidra bl-aktar mod sħiħ l-opinjoni tal-awtorità superviżorja li quddiemha jkun tressaq l-ilment u li għandha tibqa' kompetenti biex twettaq kwalunkwe investigazzjoni fit-territorju tal-Istat Membru tagħha stess f'kuntatt mal-awtorità superviżorja kompetenti.

(130) Where the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged is not the lead supervisory authority, the lead supervisory authority should closely cooperate with the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged in accordance with the provisions on cooperation and consistency laid down in this Regulation. In such cases, the lead supervisory authority should, when taking measures intended to produce legal effects, including the imposition of administrative fines, take utmost account of the view of the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged and which should remain competent to carry out any investigation on the territory of its own Member State in liaison with the competent supervisory authority.

(131) Fejn xi awtorità superviżorja oħra għandha taġixxi bħala awtorità superviżorja ewlenija għall-attivitajiet ta' pproċessar tal-kontrollur jew il-proċessur iżda s-suġġett konkret ta' lment jew il-possibbiltà ta' ksur jikkonċerna biss l-attivitajiet ta' pproċessar tal-kontrollur jew il-proċessur f'dak l-Istat Membru fejn ikun tressaq l-ilment jew fejn tkun ġiet identifikata l-possibbiltà ta' ksur u l-kwistjoni ma taffettwax b'mod sostanzjali lil suġġetti tad-data fi Stati Membri oħrajn, jew mhux probabbli li taffettwahom b'mod sostanzjali, l-awtorità superviżorja li tirċievi lment jew li tidentifika jew tiġi infurmata b'xi mod ieħor b'sitwazzjonijiet li jistgħu jinvolvu ksur possibbli ta' dan ir-Regolament għandha tfittex soluzzjoni bonarja mal-kontrollur u, jekk dan ma jirnexxix, teżerċita l-firxa sħiħa ta' setgħat tagħha. Dan għandu jinkludi pproċessar speċifiku li jsir fit-territorju tal-Istat Membru tal-awtorità superviżorja jew b'rabta mas-suġġetti tad-data fit-territorju ta' dak l-Istat Membru; jew ipproċessar li jsir fil-kuntest ta' offerta ta' oġġetti jew servizzi mmirati speċifikament lejn suġġetti tad-data fit-territorju tal-Istat Membru tal-awtorità superviżorja; jew ipproċessar li jrid jiġi vvalutat b'kont meħud tal-obbligi legali rilevanti skont il-liġi tal-Istat Membru.

(131) Where another supervisory authority should act as a lead supervisory authority for the processing activities of the controller or processor but the concrete subject matter of a complaint or the possible infringement concerns only processing activities of the controller or processor in the Member State where the complaint has been lodged or the possible infringement detected and the matter does not substantially affect or is not likely to substantially affect data subjects in other Member States, the supervisory authority receiving a complaint or detecting or being informed otherwise of situations that entail possible infringements of this Regulation should seek an amicable settlement with the controller and, if this proves unsuccessful, exercise its full range of powers. This should include: specific processing carried out in the territory of the Member State of the supervisory authority or with regard to data subjects on the territory of that Member State; processing that is carried out in the context of an offer of goods or services specifically aimed at data subjects in the territory of the Member State of the supervisory authority; or processing that has to be assessed taking into account relevant legal obligations under Member State law.

Linji ta 'Gwida & Ġurisprudenza

(EN)

Documents

Article 29 Working Party, Guidelines for Identifying a Controller or Processor’s Lead Supervisory Authority (2017).

EDPB, Guidelines 09/2020 on relevant and reasoned objection under Regulation 2016/679 (2021).

Ħalli kumment

[js-disqus]