Nascleanúint
RGCS (GDPR) > Airteagal 66. Nós imeachta práinne
Íoslódáil PDF

Airteagal 66 RGCS (GDPR). Nós imeachta práinne

Article 66 GDPR. Urgency procedure

1. In imthosca eisceachtúla, má mheasann údarás maoirseachta lena mbaineann go bhfuil géarghá le gníomhú chun cearta agus saoirsí na n-ábhar sonraí a chosaint, féadfaidh sé, de mhaolú ar an sásra comhsheasmhachta dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 63, 64 agus 65 nó de mhaolú ar an nós imeachta dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 60, bearta sealadacha a ghlacadh láithreach bonn, ar bearta iad a cheapfar chun go mbeadh éifeachtaí dlí acu ar a chríoch féin agus tréimhse bailíochta, nach mó ná trí mhí, a bheith sonraithe ina leith. Déanfaidh an t-údarás maoirseachta na bearta sin agus na cúiseanna lena nglacadh a chur in iúl gan mhoill do na húdaráis mhaoirseachta eile lena mbaineann, don Bhord agus don Choimisiún.

1. In exceptional circumstances, where a supervisory authority concerned considers that there is an urgent need to act in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects, it may, by way of derogation from the consistency mechanism referred to in Articles 63, 64 and 65 or the procedure referred to in Article 60, immediately adopt provisional measures intended to produce legal effects on its own territory with a specified period of validity which shall not exceed three months. The supervisory authority shall, without delay, communicate those measures and the reasons for adopting them to the other supervisory authorities concerned, to the Board and to the Commission.

Téacsanna gaolmhara

2. I gcás ina bhfuil beart déanta ag údarás maoirseachta de bhun mhír 1 agus ina measann sé gur gá bearta críochnaitheacha a ghlacadh ar bhonn práinne, féadfaidh sé tuairim phráinneach nó cinneadh ceangailteach práinneach a iarraidh ar an mBord, agus tabharfaidh sé cúiseanna leis an tuairim nó leis an gcinneadh sin a iarraidh.

2. Where a supervisory authority has taken a measure pursuant to paragraph 1 and considers that final measures need urgently be adopted, it may request an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision from the Board, giving reasons for requesting such opinion or decision.

3. Féadfaidh aon údarás maoirseachta tuairim phráinneach nó cinneadh ceangailteach práinneach, de réir mar a bheidh, a iarraidh ar an mBord, i gcás nach bhfuil an beart cuí glactha ag údarás maoirseachta inniúil i gcásanna ina bhfuil gá práinneach le gníomhú, chun cearta agus saoirsí na n-ábhar sonraí a chosaint, agus tabharfaidh sé cúiseanna leis an tuairim sin nó leis an gcinneadh sin a iarraidh, lena n-áirítear leis an bpráinn atá le gníomhú.

3. Any supervisory authority may request an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision, as the case may be, from the Board where a competent supervisory authority has not taken an appropriate measure in a situation where there is an urgent need to act, in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects, giving reasons for requesting such opinion or decision, including for the urgent need to act.

4. De mhaolú ar Airteagal 64(3) agus ar Airteagal 65(2), glacfar tuairim phráinneach nó cinneadh ceangailteach práinneach dá dtagraítear i mír 2 agus i mír 3 den Airteagal seo laistigh de choicís, trí thromlach simplí de chomhaltaí an Bhoird.

4. By derogation from Article 64(3) and Article 65(2), an urgent opinion or an urgent binding decision referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article shall be adopted within two weeks by simple majority of the members of the Board.

Téacsanna gaolmhara
Recitals Leave a comment
Recitals

(137) D'fhéadfadh sé go mbeadh gá práinneach le dul i mbun gnímh chun cearta agus saoirsí na n-ábhar sonraí a chosaint, go háirithe nuair a bheadh baol ann go gcuirfí isteach go mór ar fhorfheidhmiú na gceart de chuid ábhar sonraí. Dá bhrí sin, ba cheart údarás maoirseachta a bheith in ann bearta sealadacha cuí-réasúnaithe a ghlacadh ar a chríoch agus tréimhse shonraithe bailíochta leo nár cheart a bheith níos faide ná trí mhí.

(137) There may be an urgent need to act in order to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects, in particular when the danger exists that the enforcement of a right of a data subject could be considerably impeded. A supervisory authority should therefore be able to adopt duly justified provisional measures on its territory with a specified period of validity which should not exceed three months.

Leave a comment
[js-disqus]