SUVP (GDPR)
>
Člen 60. Sodelovanje med vodilnim nadzornim organom in drugimi zadevnimi nadzornimi organi
Člen 60 SUVP (GDPR). Sodelovanje med vodilnim nadzornim organom in drugimi zadevnimi nadzornimi organi
Article 60 GDPR. Cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned
1. Vodilni nadzorni organ sodeluje z drugimi zadevnimi nadzornimi organi v skladu s tem členom in si prizadeva za soglasje. Vodilni nadzorni organ in zadevni nadzorni organi si izmenjujejo vse ustrezne informacije.
1. The lead supervisory authority shall cooperate with the other supervisory authorities concerned in accordance with this Article in an endeavour to reach consensus. The lead supervisory authority and the supervisory authorities concerned shall exchange all relevant information with each other.
2. Vodilni nadzorni organ lahko od drugih zadevnih nadzornih organov kadar koli zahteva zagotovitev medsebojne pomoči v skladu s členom 61 in lahko ukrepa skupaj z njimi v skladu s členom 62, zlasti pri izvajanju preiskav ali spremljanju izvajanja ukrepa, povezanega z upravljavcem ali obdelovalcem s sedežem v drugi državi članici.
2. The lead supervisory authority may request at any time other supervisory authorities concerned to provide mutual assistance pursuant to Article 61 and may conduct joint operations pursuant to Article 62, in particular for carrying out investigations or for monitoring the implementation of a measure concerning a controller or processor established in another Member State.
3. Vodilni nadzorni organ brez odlašanja posreduje ustrezne informacije o zadevi drugim zadevnim nadzornim organom. Drugim zadevnim nadzornim organom brez odlašanja predloži osnutek odločitve, s čimer jih zaprosi za mnenje, ki ga ustrezno upošteva.
3. The lead supervisory authority shall, without delay, communicate the relevant information on the matter to the other supervisory authorities concerned. It shall without delay submit a draft decision to the other supervisory authorities concerned for their opinion and take due account of their views.
4. Kadar kateri koli od drugih zadevnih nadzornih organov v obdobju štirih tednov po opravljenem posvetovanju v skladu z odstavkom 3 tega člena poda ustrezne in utemeljene razloge za ugovor glede osnutka odločitve, vodilni nadzorni organ zadevo predloži mehanizmu za skladnost iz člena 63, če se z ugovorom ne strinja ali meni, da ugovor ni ustrezen ali utemeljen.
4. Where any of the other supervisory authorities concerned within a period of four weeks after having been consulted in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article, expresses a relevant and reasoned objection to the draft decision, the lead supervisory authority shall, if it does not follow the relevant and reasoned objection or is of the opinion that the objection is not relevant or reasoned, submit the matter to the consistency mechanism referred to in Article 63.
5. Kadar namerava vodilni nadzorni organ upoštevati ustrezen in utemeljen ugovor, drugim zadevnim nadzornim organom predloži v mnenje spremenjeni osnutek odločitve. Za ta spremenjeni osnutek odločitve se v obdobju dveh tednov uporabi postopek iz odstavka 4.
5. Where the lead supervisory authority intends to follow the relevant and reasoned objection made, it shall submit to the other supervisory authorities concerned a revised draft decision for their opinion. That revised draft decision shall be subject to the procedure referred to in paragraph 4 within a period of two weeks.
6. Kadar noben drug zadevni nadzorni organ v obdobju iz odstavkov 4 in 5 ne nasprotuje osnutku odločitve, ki jo predloži vodilni nadzorni organ, se šteje, da se vodilni nadzorni organ in zadevni nadzorni organi strinjajo s tem osnutkom odločitve, ki je zanje zavezujoča.
6. Where none of the other supervisory authorities concerned has objected to the draft decision submitted by the lead supervisory authority within the period referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5, the lead supervisory authority and the supervisory authorities concerned shall be deemed to be in agreement with that draft decision and shall be bound by it.
7. Vodilni nadzorni organ sprejme odločitev in o njej uradno obvesti glavni ali edini sedež upravljavca ali obdelovalca, odvisno od primera, zadevno odločitev ter povzetek ustreznih dejstev in razlogov pa posreduje tudi drugim zadevnim nadzornim organom in odboru. Nadzorni organ, pri katerem je bila vložena pritožba, o odločitvi obvesti pritožnika.
7. The lead supervisory authority shall adopt and notify the decision to the main establishment or single establishment of the controller or processor, as the case may be and inform the other supervisory authorities concerned and the Board of the decision in question, including a summary of the relevant facts and grounds. The supervisory authority with which a complaint has been lodged shall inform the complainant on the decision.
8. Z odstopanjem od odstavka 7 nadzorni organ, pri katerem je bila vložena pritožba, v primeru zavržene ali zavrnjene pritožbe sprejme odločitev, o kateri uradno obvesti pritožnika, sporoči pa jo tudi upravljavcu.
8. By derogation from paragraph 7, where a complaint is dismissed or rejected, the supervisory authority with which the complaint was lodged shall adopt the decision and notify it to the complainant and shall inform the controller thereof.
9. Kadar se vodilni nadzorni organ in zadevni nadzorni organi strinjajo, da se zavržejo ali zavrnejo deli pritožbe in uveljavijo drugi deli te pritožbe, se za vsakega od navedenih delov zadeve sprejme ločena odločitev. Vodilni nadzorni organ sprejme odločitev o delu, ki se nanaša na ukrepe, povezane z upravljavcem, o njej uradno obvesti glavni ali edini sedež upravljavca ali obdelovalca na ozemlju države članice, za katero je pristojen, sporoči pa jo tudi pritožniku, nadzorni organ pritožnika pa sprejme odločitev o delu, ki se nanaša na zavržbo ali zavrnitev pritožbe, in o njej uradno obvesti zadevnega pritožnika, sporoči pa jo tudi upravljavcu ali obdelovalcu.
9. Where the lead supervisory authority and the supervisory authorities concerned agree to dismiss or reject parts of a complaint and to act on other parts of that complaint, a separate decision shall be adopted for each of those parts of the matter. The lead supervisory authority shall adopt the decision for the part concerning actions in relation to the controller, shall notify it to the main establishment or single establishment of the controller or processor on the territory of its Member State and shall inform the complainant thereof, while the supervisory authority of the complainant shall adopt the decision for the part concerning dismissal or rejection of that complaint, and shall notify it to that complainant and shall inform the controller or processor thereof.
10. Upravljavec ali obdelovalec po prejemu uradnega obvestila o odločitvi vodilnega nadzornega organa v skladu z odstavkoma 7 in 9 sprejme ukrepe, potrebne za zagotovitev spoštovanja odločitve, kar zadeva obdelavo v okviru vseh njegovih sedežev v Uniji. Upravljavec ali obdelovalec o ukrepih, sprejetih za zagotovitev spoštovanja odločitve, uradno obvesti vodilni nadzorni organ, ki to sporoči drugim zadevnim nadzornim organom.
10. After being notified of the decision of the lead supervisory authority pursuant to paragraphs 7 and 9, the controller or processor shall take the necessary measures to ensure compliance with the decision as regards processing activities in the context of all its establishments in the Union. The controller or processor shall notify the measures taken for complying with the decision to the lead supervisory authority, which shall inform the other supervisory authorities concerned.
11. V izjemnih okoliščinah, ko zadevni nadzorni organ utemeljeno sklepa, da obstaja nujna potreba po ukrepanju zaradi varstva interesov posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, se uporabi nujni postopek iz člena 66.
11. Where, in exceptional circumstances, a supervisory authority concerned has reasons to consider that there is an urgent need to act in order to protect the interests of data subjects, the urgency procedure referred to in Article 66 shall apply.
12. Vodilni nadzorni organ in drugi zadevni nadzorni organi drug drugemu z elektronskimi sredstvi posredujejo zahtevane informacije iz tega člena v standardizirani obliki.
12. The lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned shall supply the information required under this Article to each other by electronic means, using a standardised format.
Splošna uredba o varstvu podatkov (SUVP, GDPR)
General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR)
The latest consolidated version of the Regulation with corrections by Corrigendum, OJ L 127, 23.5.2018, p. 2 ((EU) 2016/679). Source: EUR-lex.
Uvodne izjave
Smernice in sodna praksa
Pustite komentar
(124) Kadar obdelava osebnih podatkov poteka v okviru dejavnosti sedeža upravljavca ali obdelovalca v Uniji in ima upravljavec ali obdelovalec sedež v več kot eni državi članici ali kadar obdelava, ki poteka v okviru dejavnosti edinega sedeža upravljavca ali obdelovalca v Uniji, znatno vpliva oziroma bi lahko znatno vplivala na posameznike, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, v več kot eni državi članici, bi moral nadzorni organ za glavni sedež upravljavca ali obdelovalca ali za edini sedež upravljavca ali obdelovalca delovati kot vodilni organ. Sodelovati bi moral z drugimi zadevnimi organi, ker ima upravljavec ali obdelovalec sedež na ozemlju njihove države članice, ker obdelava znatno vpliva na posameznike, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki in ki prebivajo na njihovem ozemlju, ali ker je bila pri njih vložena pritožba. Četudi je pritožbo vložil posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki in ki ne prebiva v zadevni državi članici, bi moral biti nadzorni organ, pri katerem je bila vložena pritožba, tudi zadevni nadzorni organ. Odbor bi moral imeti možnost, da v okviru svojih nalog izdajanja smernic za vsako vprašanje v zvezi z uporabo te uredbe izda smernice zlasti glede meril, ki jih je treba upoštevati, da se ugotovi, ali zadevna obdelava znatno vpliva na posameznike, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, v več kot eni državi članici, in glede tega, kaj so ustrezni in utemeljeni razlogi za ugovor.
(124) Where the processing of personal data takes place in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the Union and the controller or processor is established in more than one Member State, or where processing taking place in the context of the activities of a single establishment of a controller or processor in the Union substantially affects or is likely to substantially affect data subjects in more than one Member State, the supervisory authority for the main establishment of the controller or processor or for the single establishment of the controller or processor should act as lead authority. It should cooperate with the other authorities concerned, because the controller or processor has an establishment on the territory of their Member State, because data subjects residing on their territory are substantially affected, or because a complaint has been lodged with them. Also where a data subject not residing in that Member State has lodged a complaint, the supervisory authority with which such complaint has been lodged should also be a supervisory authority concerned. Within its tasks to issue guidelines on any question covering the application of this Regulation, the Board should be able to issue guidelines in particular on the criteria to be taken into account in order to ascertain whether the processing in question substantially affects data subjects in more than one Member State and on what constitutes a relevant and reasoned objection.
(125) Vodilni organ bi moral biti pristojen za sprejemanje zavezujočih odločitev v zvezi z ukrepi, na podlagi katerih se uporabljajo pooblastila, ki so mu bila dodeljena v skladu s to uredbo. Nadzorni organ bi moral v vlogi vodilnega organa v postopek odločanja tesno pritegniti zadevne nadzorne organe in usklajevati njihove dejavnosti. Kadar odločitev zadeva popolno ali delno zavrnitev pritožbe posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, bi moral to odločitev sprejeti nadzorni organ, pri katerem je bila vložena pritožba.
(125) The lead authority should be competent to adopt binding decisions regarding measures applying the powers conferred on it in accordance with this Regulation. In its capacity as lead authority, the supervisory authority should closely involve and coordinate the supervisory authorities concerned in the decision-making process. Where the decision is to reject the complaint by the data subject in whole or in part, that decision should be adopted by the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged.
(126) O odločitvi bi se morali skupaj dogovoriti vodilni nadzorni organ in zadevni nadzorni organi, naslovljena pa bi morala biti na glavni ali edini sedež upravljavca ali obdelovalca in biti za upravljavca in obdelovalca zavezujoča. Upravljavec ali obdelovalec bi moral sprejeti ukrepe, potrebne za zagotovitev spoštovanja te uredbe in izvrševanje odločitve, ki jo vodilni nadzorni organ uradno sporoči glavnemu sedežu upravljavca ali obdelovalca, kar zadeva dejavnosti obdelave v Uniji.
(126) The decision should be agreed jointly by the lead supervisory authority and the supervisory authorities concerned and should be directed towards the main or single establishment of the controller or processor and be binding on the controller and processor. The controller or processor should take the necessary measures to ensure compliance with this Regulation and the implementation of the decision notified by the lead supervisory authority to the main establishment of the controller or processor as regards the processing activities in the Union.
(127) Vsak nadzorni organ, ki ne deluje kot vodilni nadzorni organ, bi moral biti pristojen za obravnavanje lokalnih zadev, kadar ima upravljavec ali obdelovalec sedež v več kot eni državi članici, vsebina določene obdelave pa se nanaša le na obdelavo v eni državi članici in vključuje le posameznike, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, iz te države članice, na primer, kadar se vsebina nanaša na obdelavo osebnih podatkov o zaposlenih v okviru zaposlitve v posamezni državi članici. V takih primerih bi moral nadzorni organ o tem brez odlašanja obvestiti vodilni nadzorni organ. Vodilni nadzorni organ bi moral, potem ko je obveščen, odločiti, ali bo zadevo obravnaval v skladu z določbami o sodelovanju med vodilnim nadzornim organom in drugimi zadevnimi nadzornimi organi (v nadaljnjem besedilu: mehanizem vse na enem mestu), oziroma ali bi moral zadevo na lokalni ravni obravnavati nadzorni organ, ki ga je o tem obvestil. Vodilni nadzorni organ bi moral pri odločanju o tem, ali bo zadevo obravnaval, upoštevati, ali ima upravljavec ali obdelovalec sedež v državi članici nadzornega organa, ki ga je o tem obvestil, da bi zagotovili učinkovito izvrševanje odločitve do upravljavca ali obdelovalca. Kadar vodilni nadzorni organ odloči, da bo zadevo obravnaval, bi moral nadzorni organ, ki ga je o tem obvestil, imeti možnost predložiti osnutek odločitve, ki bi ga moral vodilni nadzorni organ v največji meri upoštevati pri pripravi svojega osnutka odločitve v okviru tega mehanizma vse na enem mestu.
(127) Each supervisory authority not acting as the lead supervisory authority should be competent to handle local cases where the controller or processor is established in more than one Member State, but the subject matter of the specific processing concerns only processing carried out in a single Member State and involves only data subjects in that single Member State, for example, where the subject matter concerns the processing of employees' personal data in the specific employment context of a Member State. In such cases, the supervisory authority should inform the lead supervisory authority without delay about the matter. After being informed, the lead supervisory authority should decide, whether it will handle the case pursuant to the provision on cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and other supervisory authorities concerned (‘one-stop-shop mechanism’), or whether the supervisory authority which informed it should handle the case at local level. When deciding whether it will handle the case, the lead supervisory authority should take into account whether there is an establishment of the controller or processor in the Member State of the supervisory authority which informed it in order to ensure effective enforcement of a decision vis-à-vis the controller or processor. Where the lead supervisory authority decides to handle the case, the supervisory authority which informed it should have the possibility to submit a draft for a decision, of which the lead supervisory authority should take utmost account when preparing its draft decision in that one-stop-shop mechanism.
(128) Pravila o vodilnem nadzornem organu in mehanizmu vse na enem mestu se ne bi smela uporabljati, kadar obdelavo izvajajo javni organi ali zasebna telesa v javnem interesu. V takih primerih bi moral biti edini nadzorni organ, pristojen za izvajanje pooblastil, ki so mu bila podeljena v skladu s to uredbo, nadzorni organ države članice, v kateri je sedež zadevnega javnega organa ali zasebnega telesa.
(128) The rules on the lead supervisory authority and the one-stop-shop mechanism should not apply where the processing is carried out by public authorities or private bodies in the public interest. In such cases the only supervisory authority competent to exercise the powers conferred to it in accordance with this Regulation should be the supervisory authority of the Member State where the public authority or private body is established.
(130) Kadar nadzorni organ, pri katerem je bila vložena pritožba, ni vodilni nadzorni organ, bi moral vodilni nadzorni organ z njim tesno sodelovati v skladu z določbami o sodelovanju in skladnosti iz te uredbe. V takih primerih bi moral vodilni nadzorni organ pri sprejemanju ukrepov, katerih namen je doseči pravne učinke, vključno z upravnimi globami, kar najbolj upoštevati mnenje nadzornega organa, pri katerem je bila vložena pritožba in ki bi moral ostati pristojen organ za izvedbo morebitnih preiskav na ozemlju njegove države članice v povezavi s pristojnim nadzornim organom.
(130) Where the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged is not the lead supervisory authority, the lead supervisory authority should closely cooperate with the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged in accordance with the provisions on cooperation and consistency laid down in this Regulation. In such cases, the lead supervisory authority should, when taking measures intended to produce legal effects, including the imposition of administrative fines, take utmost account of the view of the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged and which should remain competent to carry out any investigation on the territory of its own Member State in liaison with the competent supervisory authority.
(131) Kadar bi moral drug nadzorni organ delovati kot vodilni nadzorni organ za dejavnosti obdelave s strani upravljavca ali obdelovalca, vendar konkretna vsebina pritožbe ali morebitne kršitve zadeva zgolj dejavnosti obdelave s strani upravljavca ali obdelovalca v državi članici, v kateri je bila vložena pritožba ali odkrita morebitna kršitev, vsebina pa ne vpliva znatno oziroma ni verjetno, da bi znatno vplivala na posameznike, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, v drugih državah članicah, bi si moral nadzorni organ, ki prejme pritožbo ali odkrije primere, pri katerih bi lahko šlo za kršitev te uredbe, oziroma je o njih kako drugače obveščen, prizadevati za sporazumno rešitev z upravljavcem, če se to izkaže za neuspešno, pa izvajati vsa svoja pooblastila. To bi moralo vključevati: posebno obdelavo, ki se izvaja na ozemlju države članice nadzornega organa ali v zvezi s posamezniki, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, na ozemlju zadevne države članice; obdelavo, ki se izvaja v okviru ponudbe blaga ali storitev, posebej namenjene posameznikom, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, na ozemlju države članice nadzornega organa; ali obdelavo, ki jo je treba oceniti ob upoštevanju ustreznih pravnih obveznosti v skladu s pravom držav članic.
(131) Where another supervisory authority should act as a lead supervisory authority for the processing activities of the controller or processor but the concrete subject matter of a complaint or the possible infringement concerns only processing activities of the controller or processor in the Member State where the complaint has been lodged or the possible infringement detected and the matter does not substantially affect or is not likely to substantially affect data subjects in other Member States, the supervisory authority receiving a complaint or detecting or being informed otherwise of situations that entail possible infringements of this Regulation should seek an amicable settlement with the controller and, if this proves unsuccessful, exercise its full range of powers. This should include: specific processing carried out in the territory of the Member State of the supervisory authority or with regard to data subjects on the territory of that Member State; processing that is carried out in the context of an offer of goods or services specifically aimed at data subjects in the territory of the Member State of the supervisory authority; or processing that has to be assessed taking into account relevant legal obligations under Member State law.
(EN)
Documents
Article 29 Working Party, Guidelines for Identifying a Controller or Processor’s Lead Supervisory Authority (2017).
EDPB, Guidelines 09/2020 on relevant and reasoned objection under Regulation 2016/679 (2021).
[js-disqus]
(EN) Url-link to highlighted text was copied to the clipboard!
(EN) Preparing download...