(131) 當有另一監管機關應就控管者或處理者之資料處理活動擔任 領導監管機關，但申訴之具體標的或可能之違法行為僅涉及到該控管 者或處理者在受理申訴或所調查出可能違法行為所在會員國之處理 活動，且該標的並不會或較無可能對其他會員國之資料主體造成重大 影響時，該受理申訴或查得或由其他管道得知疑似有違反本規則情況 之監管機關應與該控管者尋求友好解決，若證實前述為不可行時，則 應行使其完整之權力。此應包括：在該監管機關所屬會員國境內或就 該會員國境內之資料主體所為之特定資料處理；在提供商品或服務的 情況下特別針對該監管機關所屬會員國境內之資料主體所為之資料 處理；或應以會員國法所課予之相關法律義務進行評估之資料處理。
(131) Where another supervisory authority should act as a lead supervisory authority for the processing activities of the controller or processor but the concrete subject matter of a complaint or the possible infringement concerns only processing activities of the controller or processor in the Member State where the complaint has been lodged or the possible infringement detected and the matter does not substantially affect or is not likely to substantially affect data subjects in other Member States, the supervisory authority receiving a complaint or detecting or being informed otherwise of situations that entail possible infringements of this Regulation should seek an amicable settlement with the controller and, if this proves unsuccessful, exercise its full range of powers.
This should include: specific processing carried out in the territory of the Member State of the supervisory authority or with regard to data subjects on the territory of that Member State; processing that is carried out in the context of an offer of goods or services specifically aimed at data subjects in the territory of the Member State of the supervisory authority; or processing that has to be assessed taking into account relevant legal obligations under Member State law.
The latest consolidated version of the Regulation with corrections by Corrigendum, OJ L 127, 23.5.2018, p. 2 ((EU) 2016/679). Source: EUR-lex.