Uvodna izjava 50
Recital 50
(50) Obdelava osebnih podatkov za druge namene kot tiste, za katere so bili osebni podatki prvotno zbrani, bi morala biti dovoljena le, kadar je združljiva z nameni, za katere so bili osebni podatki prvotno zbrani.
V takšnem primeru ni potrebna ločena pravna podlaga od tiste, na podlagi katere so bili osebni podatki zbrani.
Če je obdelava potrebna za izvajanje naloge v javnem interesu ali pri izvajanju javne oblasti, dodeljene upravljavcu, se lahko naloge in nameni, za katere bi se nadaljnja obdelava morala šteti za združljivo in zakonito, določijo in opredelijo s pravom Unije ali pravom držav članic.
Nadaljnja obdelava v namene arhiviranja v javnem interesu, znanstveno- ali zgodovinskoraziskovalne namene ali statistične namene bi morala veljati za združljivo zakonito dejanje obdelave.
Pravna podlaga, ki se za obdelavo osebnih podatkov določi s pravom Unije ali pravom držav članic, je lahko tudi pravna podlaga za nadaljnjo obdelavo.
Za ugotovitev, ali je namen nadaljnje obdelave združljiv z namenom, za katerega so bili osebni podatki prvotno zbrani, bi moral upravljavec, potem ko je izpolnil vse zahteve glede zakonitosti prvotne obdelave, med drugim upoštevati morebitno povezavo med prvotnimi nameni in nameni načrtovane nadaljnje obdelave; okoliščine, v katerih so bili osebni podatki zbrani, zlasti razumna pričakovanja posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, o nadaljnji uporabi teh podatkov ob upoštevanju njihovega razmerja z upravljavcem; naravo osebnih podatkov; posledice načrtovane nadaljnje obdelave za te posameznike in obstoj ustreznih zaščitnih ukrepov, tako pri prvotnih kot načrtovanih nadaljnjih dejanjih obdelave.
(50) The processing of personal data for purposes other than those for which the personal data were initially collected should be allowed only where the processing is compatible with the purposes for which the personal data were initially collected.
In such a case, no legal basis separate from that which allowed the collection of the personal data is required.
If the processing is necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the controller, Union or Member State law may determine and specify the tasks and purposes for which the further processing should be regarded as compatible and lawful.
Further processing for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes should be considered to be compatible lawful processing operations.
The legal basis provided by Union or Member State law for the processing of personal data may also provide a legal basis for further processing.
In order to ascertain whether a purpose of further processing is compatible with the purpose for which the personal data are initially collected, the controller, after having met all the requirements for the lawfulness of the original processing, should take into account, inter alia: any link between those purposes and the purposes of the intended further processing; the context in which the personal data have been collected, in particular the reasonable expectations of data subjects based on their relationship with the controller as to their further use; the nature of the personal data; the consequences of the intended further processing for data subjects; and the existence of appropriate safeguards in both the original and intended further processing operations.
Kadar je posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, privolil ali če obdelava temelji na pravu Unije ali pravu države članice, kar je potreben in sorazmeren ukrep v demokratični družbi za varovanje zlasti pomembnih ciljev v splošnem javnem interesu, bi moralo biti upravljavcu dovoljeno, da nadalje obdeluje osebne podatke, ne glede na združljivost namenov.
V vsakem primeru bi bilo treba zagotoviti uporabo načel iz te uredbe in zlasti obveščanje posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, o teh drugih namenih in njegovih pravicah, tudi o pravici do ugovora.
Za opozorila s strani upravljavca na morebitna kazniva dejanja ali grožnje javni varnosti in posredovanje zadevnih osebnih podatkov v posameznih primerih ali v več primerih, ki se nanašajo na isto kaznivo dejanje ali grožnje javni varnosti, pristojnemu organu bi moralo veljati, da so v zakonitem interesu, za katerega si prizadeva upravljavec.
Takšno posredovanje v zakonitem interesu upravljavca ali nadaljnja obdelava osebnih podatkov pa bi morala biti prepovedana, če obdelava ni združljiva z obveznostjo varovanja pravne ali poklicne skrivnosti ali drugo zavezujočo obveznostjo varovanja skrivnosti.
Where the data subject has given consent or the processing is based on Union or Member State law which constitutes a necessary and proportionate measure in a democratic society to safeguard, in particular, important objectives of general public interest, the controller should be allowed to further process the personal data irrespective of the compatibility of the purposes.
In any case, the application of the principles set out in this Regulation and in particular the information of the data subject on those other purposes and on his or her rights including the right to object, should be ensured.
Indicating possible criminal acts or threats to public security by the controller and transmitting the relevant personal data in individual cases or in several cases relating to the same criminal act or threats to public security to a competent authority should be regarded as being in the legitimate interest pursued by the controller.
However, such transmission in the legitimate interest of the controller or further processing of personal data should be prohibited if the processing is not compatible with a legal, professional or other binding obligation of secrecy.
The latest consolidated version of the Regulation with corrections by Corrigendum, OJ L 127, 23.5.2018, p. 2 ((EU) 2016/679). Source: EUR-lex.