GDPR
>
Članak 36.. Prethodno savjetovanje
Članak 36. GDPR. Prethodno savjetovanje
Article 36 GDPR. Prior consultation
1. Voditelj obrade savjetuje se s nadzornim tijelom prije obrade ako se procjenom učinka na zaštitu podataka iz članka 35. pokazalo da bi, u slučaju da voditelj obrade ne donese mjere za ublažavanje rizika, obrada dovela do visokog rizika.
1. The controller shall consult the supervisory authority prior to processing where a data protection impact assessment under Article 35 indicates that the processing would result in a high risk in the absence of measures taken by the controller to mitigate the risk.
2. Ako nadzorno tijelo smatra da bi se namjeravanom obradom iz stavka 1. kršila ova Uredba, osobito ako voditelj obrade nije u dovoljnoj mjeri utvrdio ili umanjio rizik, nadzorno tijelo u roku od najviše osam tjedana od zaprimanja zahtjeva za savjetovanje pisanim putem savjetuje voditelja obrade i, prema potrebi, izvršitelja obrade, te može iskoristiti bilo koju od svojih ovlasti iz članka 58. Taj se rok može prema potrebi produžiti za šest tjedana, uzimajući u obzir složenost namjeravane obrade. Nadzorno tijelo u roku od mjesec dana od zaprimanja zahtjeva obavješćuje voditelja obrade, i, prema potrebi, izvršitelja obrade o svakom takvom produljenju i o razlozima odgode. Ti se rokovi mogu suspendirati sve dok nadzorno tijelo ne dobije informacije koje je moglo zatražiti u svrhe savjetovanja.
2. Where the supervisory authority is of the opinion that the intended processing referred to in paragraph 1 would infringe this Regulation, in particular where the controller has insufficiently identified or mitigated the risk, the supervisory authority shall, within period of up to eight weeks of receipt of the request for consultation, provide written advice to the controller and, where applicable to the processor, and may use any of its powers referred to in Article 58. That period may be extended by six weeks, taking into account the complexity of the intended processing. The supervisory authority shall inform the controller and, where applicable, the processor, of any such extension within one month of receipt of the request for consultation together with the reasons for the delay. Those periods may be suspended until the supervisory authority has obtained information it has requested for the purposes of the consultation.
3. Prilikom savjetovanja s nadzornim tijelom u skladu sa stavkom 1. voditelj obrade nadzornom tijelu dostavlja:
3. When consulting the supervisory authority pursuant to paragraph 1, the controller shall provide the supervisory authority with:
(a) ako je primjenjivo, odgovarajuće odgovornosti voditelja obrade, zajedničkih voditelja obrade i izvršitelja obrade uključenih u obradu, osobito za obrade unutar grupe poduzetnika;
(a) where applicable, the respective responsibilities of the controller, joint controllers and processors involved in the processing, in particular for processing within a group of undertakings;
(c) zaštitne mjere i druge mjere za zaštitu prava i sloboda ispitanika u na temelju ove Uredbe;
(c) the measures and safeguards provided to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects pursuant to this Regulation;
(d) ako je primjenjivo, kontaktne podatke službenika za zaštitu podataka;
(d) where applicable, the contact details of the data protection officer;
(f) sve druge informacije koje nadzorno tijelo zatraži.
(f) any other information requested by the supervisory authority.
4. Države članice savjetuju se s nadzornim tijelom tijekom izrade prijedloga zakonodavne mjere koju donosi nacionalni parlament ili podzakonske mjere koja se temelji na takvoj zakonodavnoj mjeri, a koja se odnosi na obradu.
4. Member States shall consult the supervisory authority during the preparation of a proposal for a legislative measure to be adopted by a national parliament, or of a regulatory measure based on such a legislative measure, which relates to processing.
5. Neovisno ostavku 2., od voditelja obrade se pravom države članice može zahtijevati da se savjetuju s nadzornim tijelom i od njega dobiju prethodno odobrenje u pogledu obrade koju obavlja voditelj obrade za izvršenje zadaće koju voditelj obrade provodi u javnom interesu, uključujući i obradu u vezi sa socijalnom zaštitom i javnim zdravljem.
5. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member State law may require controllers to consult with, and obtain prior authorisation from, the supervisory authority in relation to processing by a controller for the performance of a task carried out by the controller in the public interest, including processing in relation to social protection and public health.
Opća uredba o zaštiti podataka (GDPR)
General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR)
The latest consolidated version of the Regulation with corrections by Corrigendum, OJ L 127, 23.5.2018, p. 2 ((EU) 2016/679). Source: EUR-lex.
ISO 27701
Uvodne izjave
Ostavite komentar
(94) Ako se u procjeni učinka na zaštitu podataka pokaže da bi obrada u nedostatku zaštitnih mjera, sigurnosnih mjera i mehanizama za umanjivanje rizika dovela do visokog rizika za prava i slobode pojedinaca, a voditelj obrade smatra da se taj rizik ne može umanjiti razumnim mjerama u pogledu dostupne tehnologije i troškova provedbe, prije početka obrade trebalo bi se savjetovati s nadzornim tijelom. Takav visok rizik vjerojatno će proizaći iz određenih vrsta obrade i opsega i učestalosti obrade, što može također prouzročiti štetu ili ometanje prava i slobode ispitanika. Nadzorno tijelo trebalo bi odgovoriti na zahtjev za savjetovanje u određenom vremenskom roku. Međutim, izostanak reakcije nadzornog tijela u tom roku ne bi smio utjecati na bilo koju intervenciju nadzornog tijela u skladu sa njegovim zadaćama i ovlastima iz ove Uredbe, uključujući ovlast da zabrani postupke obrade. Rezultat procjene učinka na zaštitu podataka koja je provedena u vezi s dotičnom obradom može se kao dio tog postupka savjetovanja dostaviti nadzornom tijelu, a osobito mjere predviđene za umanjivanje rizika za prava i slobode pojedinaca.
(94) Where a data protection impact assessment indicates that the processing would, in the absence of safeguards, security measures and mechanisms to mitigate the risk, result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons and the controller is of the opinion that the risk cannot be mitigated by reasonable means in terms of available technologies and costs of implementation, the supervisory authority should be consulted prior to the start of processing activities. Such high risk is likely to result from certain types of processing and the extent and frequency of processing, which may result also in a realisation of damage or interference with the rights and freedoms of the natural person. The supervisory authority should respond to the request for consultation within a specified period. However, the absence of a reaction of the supervisory authority within that period should be without prejudice to any intervention of the supervisory authority in accordance with its tasks and powers laid down in this Regulation, including the power to prohibit processing operations. As part of that consultation process, the outcome of a data protection impact assessment carried out with regard to the processing at issue may be submitted to the supervisory authority, in particular the measures envisaged to mitigate the risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons.
(95) Prema potrebi i na zahtjev, izvršitelj obrade trebao bi pomagati voditelju obrade u osiguravanju usklađenosti s obvezama koje proizlaze iz provedbe procjene učinka na zaštitu podataka i iz prethodnog savjetovanja s nadzornim tijelom.
(95) The processor should assist the controller, where necessary and upon request, in ensuring compliance with the obligations deriving from the carrying out of data protection impact assessments and from prior consultation of the supervisory authority.
(96) Savjetovanje s nadležnim tijelom također bi se trebalo održati tijekom izrade zakonodavne ili regulatorne mjere koja propisuje obradu osobnih podataka radi osiguravanja usklađenosti predviđene obrade s ovom Uredbom te osobito radi umanjivanja rizika za ispitanika.
(96) A consultation of the supervisory authority should also take place in the course of the preparation of a legislative or regulatory measure which provides for the processing of personal data, in order to ensure compliance of the intended processing with this Regulation and in particular to mitigate the risk involved for the data subject.
[js-disqus]
(EN) Url-link to highlighted text was copied to the clipboard!
(EN) Preparing download...
(EN) ISO/IEC 27701, adopted in 2019, added a requirement additional to ISO/IEC 27001, section 4.2.
Here is the relevant paragraph to article 36 GDPR:
5.2.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
The organization shall include among its interested parties (see ISO/IEC 27001:2013, 4.2), those parties having interests or responsibilities associated with the processing of PII, including the PII principals.
(EN) […]
(EN) Sign in
to read the full text