(89) Direktivom 95/46/EZ predviđena je opća obveza izvješćivanja nadzornih tijela o obradi osobnih podataka. Nametanjem te obveze stvara se administrativni i financijski teret, a ona nije u svim slučajevima dovela do poboljšanja zaštite osobnih podataka. Trebalo bi, stoga, ukinuti takve sveobuhvatne obveze općeg obavješćivanja i zamijeniti ih djelotvornim postupcima i mehanizmima koji se umjesto toga usredotočuju na one vrste postupaka obrade koji vjerojatno mogu prouzročiti visok rizik za prava i slobode pojedinaca zbog svoje prirode, opsega, konteksta i svrha. Takve vrste postupaka obrade mogu biti osobito one koje uključuju upotrebu novih tehnologija ili one koje su nove vrste i s obzirom na koje voditelj obrade još nije proveo procjenu učinka na zaštitu podataka ili za koje je procjena učinka na zaštitu podataka postala potrebna s obzirom na vrijeme koje je proteklo od prvotne obrade.
(89) Directive 95/46/EC provided for a general obligation to notify the processing of personal data to the supervisory authorities. While that obligation produces administrative and financial burdens, it did not in all cases contribute to improving the protection of personal data. Such indiscriminate general notification obligations should therefore be abolished, and replaced by effective procedures and mechanisms which focus instead on those types of processing operations which are likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons by virtue of their nature, scope, context and purposes. Such types of processing operations may be those which in, particular, involve using new technologies, or are of a new kind and where no data protection impact assessment has been carried out before by the controller, or where they become necessary in the light of the time that has elapsed since the initial processing.
(90) U takvim slučajevima, voditelj obrade trebao bi provesti procjenu učinka na zaštitu podataka prije obrade radi procjene osobite vjerojatnosti i ozbiljnosti visokog rizika, uzimajući u obzir prirodu, opseg, kontekst i svrhe obrade te izvore rizika. Ta bi procjena učinka trebala posebno uključivati mjere, zaštitne mjere i mehanizme predviđene za umanjivanje tog rizika, za osiguravanje zaštite osobnih podataka i dokazivanje sukladnosti s ovom Uredbom.
(90) In such cases, a data protection impact assessment should be carried out by the controller prior to the processing in order to assess the particular likelihood and severity of the high risk, taking into account the nature, scope, context and purposes of the processing and the sources of the risk. That impact assessment should include, in particular, the measures, safeguards and mechanisms envisaged for mitigating that risk, ensuring the protection of personal data and demonstrating compliance with this Regulation.
(EN) ISO/IEC 27701, adopted in 2019, added a requirement additional to ISO/IEC 27001, section 4.1.
Here is the relevant paragraph to article 40 GDPR:
5.2.1 Understanding the organization and its context
The organization shall include among its interested parties (see ISO/IEC 27001:2013, 4.2), those parties having interests or responsibilities associated with the processing of PII, including the PII principals.
(EN) […]
(EN) Sign in
to read the full text