(75) Tveganje za pravice in svoboščine posameznika, ki se razlikuje po verjetnosti in resnosti, je lahko posledica obdelave osebnih podatkov, ki bi lahko povzročila fizično, premoženjsko in ali nepremoženjsko škodo, zlasti: kadar obdelava lahko privede do diskriminacije, kraje ali zlorabe identitete, finančne izgube, okrnitve ugleda, izgube zaupnosti osebnih podatkov, zaščitenih s poklicno molčečnostjo, neodobrene reverzije psevdonimizacije ali katere koli druge znatne gospodarske ali socialne škode; kadar bi bile posameznikom, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, lahko odvzete pravice in svoboščine ali bi jim bilo preprečeno izvajanje nadzora nad njihovimi osebnimi podatki; kadar se obdelujejo osebni podatki, ki razkrivajo rasno ali etnično poreklo, politična mnenja, veroizpoved ali filozofsko prepričanje ali članstvo v sindikatu, ter obdelovanje genetskih podatkov ali podatkov v zvezi z zdravjem ali podatkov v zvezi s spolnim življenjem ali kazenskimi obsodbami in prekrški ali s tem povezanimi varnostnimi ukrepi, kadar se vrednotijo osebni vidiki, zlasti analiziranje ali predvidevanje vidikov, ki zadevajo uspešnost pri delu, ekonomski položaj, zdravje, osebni okus ali interese, zanesljivost ali vedenje, lokacijo ali gibanje, da bi se ustvarili ali uporabljali osebni profili, kadar se obdelujejo osebni podatki ranljivih posameznikov, zlasti otrok; ali kadar obdelava vključuje veliko število osebnih podatkov in zadeva veliko število posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki.
(75) The risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, of varying likelihood and severity, may result from personal data processing which could lead to physical, material or non-material damage, in particular: where the processing may give rise to discrimination, identity theft or fraud, financial loss, damage to the reputation, loss of confidentiality of personal data protected by professional secrecy, unauthorised reversal of pseudonymisation, or any other significant economic or social disadvantage; where data subjects might be deprived of their rights and freedoms or prevented from exercising control over their personal data; where personal data are processed which reveal racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religion or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership, and the processing of genetic data, data concerning health or data concerning sex life or criminal convictions and offences or related security measures; where personal aspects are evaluated, in particular analysing or predicting aspects concerning performance at work, economic situation, health, personal preferences or interests, reliability or behaviour, location or movements, in order to create or use personal profiles; where personal data of vulnerable natural persons, in particular of children, are processed; or where processing involves a large amount of personal data and affects a large number of data subjects.
(84) Za povečanje skladnosti s to uredbo, kadar bodo dejanja obdelave verjetno povzročila veliko tveganje za pravice in svoboščine posameznikov, bi moral biti upravljavec odgovoren za izvedbo ocene učinka v zvezi z varstvom podatkov, da bi ocenili predvsem izvor, naravo, posebnost in resnost tega tveganja. Rezultat ocene bi bilo treba upoštevati pri določitvi ustreznih ukrepov, ki jih je treba sprejeti, da bi dokazali, da je obdelava osebnih podatkov v skladu s to uredbo. Kadar se na podlagi ocene učinka v zvezi z varstvom podatkov ugotovi, da dejanja obdelave predstavljajo veliko tveganje, ki ga upravljavec ne more ublažiti z ustreznimi ukrepi v smislu razpoložljive tehnologije in stroškov izvajanja, bi se bilo treba pred obdelavo posvetovati z nadzornim organom.
(84) In order to enhance compliance with this Regulation where processing operations are likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, the controller should be responsible for the carrying-out of a data protection impact assessment to evaluate, in particular, the origin, nature, particularity and severity of that risk. The outcome of the assessment should be taken into account when determining the appropriate measures to be taken in order to demonstrate that the processing of personal data complies with this Regulation. Where a data-protection impact assessment indicates that processing operations involve a high risk which the controller cannot mitigate by appropriate measures in terms of available technology and costs of implementation, a consultation of the supervisory authority should take place prior to the processing.
(89) Direktiva 95/46/ES je določala splošno obveznost glede obveščanja nadzornih organov o obdelavi osebnih podatkov. Ta obveznost prinaša upravna in finančna bremena, ni pa v vseh primerih pripomogla k izboljšanju varstva osebnih podatkov. Zato bi bilo treba take nerazlikovalne splošne obveznosti obveščanja odpraviti ter nadomestiti z učinkovitimi postopki in mehanizmi, ki se namesto tega osredotočajo na tiste vrste dejanj obdelave, ki zaradi svoje narave, obsega, okoliščin in namenov verjetno povzročajo veliko tveganje za pravice in svoboščine posameznikov. Take vrste dejanj obdelave so lahko tiste, ki zlasti vključujejo uporabo novih tehnologij ali ki so nove in zanje upravljavec še ni izvedel ocene učinka v zvezi z varstvom podatkov ali postanejo potrebne zaradi časa, ki je pretekel od prvotne obdelave.
(89) Directive 95/46/EC provided for a general obligation to notify the processing of personal data to the supervisory authorities. While that obligation produces administrative and financial burdens, it did not in all cases contribute to improving the protection of personal data. Such indiscriminate general notification obligations should therefore be abolished, and replaced by effective procedures and mechanisms which focus instead on those types of processing operations which are likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons by virtue of their nature, scope, context and purposes. Such types of processing operations may be those which in, particular, involve using new technologies, or are of a new kind and where no data protection impact assessment has been carried out before by the controller, or where they become necessary in the light of the time that has elapsed since the initial processing.
(90) V takih primerih bi moral upravljavec pred obdelavo izvesti oceno učinka v zvezi z varstvom podatkov, da bi se ocenili posebna verjetnost in resnost velikega tveganja, pri čemer bi upoštevali naravo, obseg, okoliščine in namene obdelave ter izvor tveganja. Ta ocena učinka pa bi morala obsegati zlasti ukrepe, zaščitne ukrepe in mehanizme, ki so načrtovani za ublažitev tega tveganja, zagotavljanje varstva osebnih podatkov in dokazovanje skladnosti s to uredbo.
(90) In such cases, a data protection impact assessment should be carried out by the controller prior to the processing in order to assess the particular likelihood and severity of the high risk, taking into account the nature, scope, context and purposes of the processing and the sources of the risk. That impact assessment should include, in particular, the measures, safeguards and mechanisms envisaged for mitigating that risk, ensuring the protection of personal data and demonstrating compliance with this Regulation.
(91) To bi moralo veljati zlasti za obsežna dejanja obdelave, ki so namenjena obdelavi precejšnje količine osebnih podatkov na regionalni, nacionalni ali nadnacionalni ravni in bi lahko vplivali na veliko število posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, ter za katere je verjetno, da bodo povzročila veliko tveganje, na primer zaradi njihove občutljivosti, kadar se v skladu z doseženo stopnjo tehnološkega znanja uporablja nova tehnologija v velikem obsegu, ter tudi za druga dejanja obdelave, ki povzročajo veliko tveganje za pravice in svoboščine posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, zlasti kadar ta dejanja posameznikom, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, otežijo uresničevanje njihovih pravic. Oceno učinka v zvezi z varstvom podatkov bi bilo treba izvesti tudi, kadar se osebni podatki obdelujejo za sprejemanje odločitev v zvezi z določenimi posamezniki po kakršnem koli sistematičnem in obsežnem vrednotenju osebnih vidikov v zvezi s posamezniki na podlagi oblikovanja profilov teh podatkov ali po obdelavi posebnih vrst osebnih podatkov, biometričnih podatkov ali podatkov o kazenskih obsodbah in prekrških ali s tem povezanih varnostnih ukrepih. Ocena učinka v zvezi z varstvom podatkov se zahteva tudi za spremljanje javno dostopnih območij v velikem obsegu, zlasti z uporabo optično-elektronskih naprav, ali za katera koli druga dejanja, za katera pristojni nadzorni organ meni, da bo obdelava verjetno povzročila veliko tveganje za pravice in svoboščine posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, zlasti ker tem posameznikom preprečujejo uresničevanje pravice ali uporabo storitve ali pogodbe ali ker se sistematično izvajajo v velikem obsegu. Obdelava osebnih podatkov se ne bi smela šteti kot obdelava v velikem obsegu, če gre za obdelavo osebnih podatkov pacientov ali strank s strani posameznega zdravnika,drugega zdravstvenega delavca ali odvetnika. V takih primerih ocena učinka v zvezi z varstvom podatkov ne bi smela biti obvezna.
(91) This should in particular apply to large-scale processing operations which aim to process a considerable amount of personal data at regional, national or supranational level and which could affect a large number of data subjects and which are likely to result in a high risk, for example, on account of their sensitivity, where in accordance with the achieved state of technological knowledge a new technology is used on a large scale as well as to other processing operations which result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects, in particular where those operations render it more difficult for data subjects to exercise their rights. A data protection impact assessment should also be made where personal data are processed for taking decisions regarding specific natural persons following any systematic and extensive evaluation of personal aspects relating to natural persons based on profiling those data or following the processing of special categories of personal data, biometric data, or data on criminal convictions and offences or related security measures. A data protection impact assessment is equally required for monitoring publicly accessible areas on a large scale, especially when using optic-electronic devices or for any other operations where the competent supervisory authority considers that the processing is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects, in particular because they prevent data subjects from exercising a right or using a service or a contract, or because they are carried out systematically on a large scale. The processing of personal data should not be considered to be on a large scale if the processing concerns personal data from patients or clients by an individual physician, other health care professional or lawyer. In such cases, a data protection impact assessment should not be mandatory.
(92) V nekaterih okoliščinah je razumno in gospodarno, da je predmet ocene učinka v zvezi z varstvom podatkov obširnejši in ne obsega samo enega projekta, na primer kadar nameravajo javni organi ali telesa vzpostaviti skupno platformo za uporabo ali obdelavo ali kadar namerava več upravljavcev uvesti skupno okolje za uporabo ali obdelavo v celotnem industrijskem sektorju ali njegovem delu ali za horizontalno dejavnost v široki rabi.
(92) There are circumstances under which it may be reasonable and economical for the subject of a data protection impact assessment to be broader than a single project, for example where public authorities or bodies intend to establish a common application or processing platform or where several controllers plan to introduce a common application or processing environment across an industry sector or segment or for a widely used horizontal activity.
(93) V okviru sprejetja prava držav članic, na katerem temelji opravljanje nalog javnega organa ali telesa in ki ureja zadevne posebna dejanja obdelave ali nize dejanj, lahko države članice menijo, da je treba tako oceno opraviti pred dejavnostmi obdelave.
(93) In the context of the adoption of the Member State law on which the performance of the tasks of the public authority or public body is based and which regulates the specific processing operation or set of operations in question, Member States may deem it necessary to carry out such assessment prior to the processing activities.
(EN) ISO/IEC 27701, adopted in 2019, added additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII processors.
Here is the relevant paragraph to articles 35(1) GDPR:
8.2.1 Customer agreement
Control
The organization should ensure, where relevant, that the contract to process PII addresses the organization’s role in providing assistance with the customer’s obligations (taking into account the nature of processing and the information available to the organization).
Implementation guidance
The contract between the organization and the customer should include the following wherever relevant, and depending on the customer’s role (PII controller or PII processor) (this list is neither definitive nor exhaustive):
…
Connettersi
per accedere al testo completo