Recital 151
Recital 151
(151) 丹麥及愛沙尼亞之法律體系不允許本規則所規範之行政罰鍰。 行政罰之規範在丹麥得以該國管轄法院裁判處以刑罰之方式行之；在 愛沙尼亞得以監管機關處理輕罪程序之架構處以罰金之方式行之；惟 上開會員國該等規範之適用，應與監管機關處以罰鍰之效果相當。因 此，內國管轄法院應考慮監管機關處以罰鍰之建議。在任何情況下， 處以罰鍰應係有效、適當且具懲戒性的。
(151) The legal systems of Denmark and Estonia do not allow for administrative fines as set out in this Regulation.
The rules on administrative fines may be applied in such a manner that in Denmark the fine is imposed by competent national courts as a criminal penalty and in Estonia the fine is imposed by the supervisory authority in the framework of a misdemeanour procedure, provided that such an application of the rules in those Member States has an equivalent effect to administrative fines imposed by supervisory authorities.
Therefore the competent national courts should take into account the recommendation by the supervisory authority initiating the fine.
In any event, the fines imposed should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Source: https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=F98A8C27A0F54C30
The latest consolidated version of the Regulation with corrections by Corrigendum, OJ L 127, 23.5.2018, p. 2 ((EU) 2016/679). Source: EUR-lex.