Recital 136
Recital 136
(136) 當適用一致性機制時，若委員會之多數成員皆如此決定，或任 何相關監管機關或執委會如此要求者，該委員會應於一定時間內公告 其意見。當監管機關間有爭執時，委員會亦應有權通過有法拘束力之 裁決。為達該目的，原則上經其成員三分之二以上之多數決同意，其 即應對監管機關間存有意見衝突之清楚特定案件，發布具法拘束力之 裁決，尤其是在領導監管機關與相關監管機關間在協作機制下就個案 所持見解，特別是就是否違反本規則之見解發生衝突時。
(136) In applying the consistency mechanism, the Board should, within a determined period of time, issue an opinion, if a majority of its members so decides or if so requested by any supervisory authority concerned or the Commission.
The Board should also be empowered to adopt legally binding decisions where there are disputes between supervisory authorities.
For that purpose, it should issue, in principle by a two-thirds majority of its members, legally binding decisions in clearly specified cases where there are conflicting views among supervisory authorities, in particular in the cooperation mechanism between the lead supervisory authority and supervisory authorities concerned on the merits of the case, in particular whether there is an infringement of this Regulation.
Source: https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=F98A8C27A0F54C30
The latest consolidated version of the Regulation with corrections by Corrigendum, OJ L 127, 23.5.2018, p. 2 ((EU) 2016/679). Source: EUR-lex.