Uvodna izjava 36
Recital 36
(36) Glavni sedež upravljavca v Uniji bi moral biti kraj njegove osrednje uprave v Uniji, razen če se odločitve o namenih in sredstvih obdelave osebnih podatkov sprejemajo na drugem sedežu upravljavca v Uniji in bi v tem primeru moral ta drugi sedež veljati za glavni sedež.
Glavni sedež upravljavca v Uniji bi moral biti določen v skladu z objektivnimi merili ter bi moral pomeniti učinkovito in dejansko izvajanje dejavnosti upravljanja, ki glavne odločitve glede namenov in sredstev za obdelavo določajo prek ustaljenih ureditev.
To merilo ne bi smelo biti odvisno od tega, ali se obdelava osebnih podatkov izvaja v tem kraju.
Prisotnost in uporaba tehničnih sredstev in tehnologij za obdelavo osebnih podatkov ali dejavnosti obdelave sami po sebi ne pomenita glavnega sedeža in zato nista odločujoče merilo za glavni sedež.
Glavni sedež obdelovalca bi moral biti kraj njegove osrednje uprave v Uniji ali, kadar nima osrednje uprave v Uniji, kraj, kjer potekajo glavne dejavnosti obdelave v Uniji.
V primerih, ki vključujejo upravljavca in obdelovalca, bi moral biti pristojni vodilni nadzorni organ še naprej nadzorni organ države članice, v kateri ima upravljavec glavni sedež, nadzorni organ obdelovalca pa bi se moral šteti za zadevni nadzorni organ; ta nadzorni organ bi moral biti udeležen v postopku sodelovanja, določenem v tej uredbi.
Vsekakor se nadzorni organi države članice ali držav članic, v katerih ima obdelovalec enega ali več sedežev, ne bi smeli šteti kot zadevni nadzorni organi, kadar osnutek odločitve zadeva samo upravljavca.
Kadar obdelavo izvaja povezana družba, bi bilo treba glavni sedež obvladujoče družbe šteti za glavni sedež povezane družbe, razen kadar namene in sredstva obdelave določa druga družba.
(36) The main establishment of a controller in the Union should be the place of its central administration in the Union, unless the decisions on the purposes and means of the processing of personal data are taken in another establishment of the controller in the Union, in which case that other establishment should be considered to be the main establishment.
The main establishment of a controller in the Union should be determined according to objective criteria and should imply the effective and real exercise of management activities determining the main decisions as to the purposes and means of processing through stable arrangements.
That criterion should not depend on whether the processing of personal data is carried out at that location.
The presence and use of technical means and technologies for processing personal data or processing activities do not, in themselves, constitute a main establishment and are therefore not determining criteria for a main establishment.
The main establishment of the processor should be the place of its central administration in the Union or, if it has no central administration in the Union, the place where the main processing activities take place in the Union.
In cases involving both the controller and the processor, the competent lead supervisory authority should remain the supervisory authority of the Member State where the controller has its main establishment, but the supervisory authority of the processor should be considered to be a supervisory authority concerned and that supervisory authority should participate in the cooperation procedure provided for by this Regulation.
In any case, the supervisory authorities of the Member State or Member States where the processor has one or more establishments should not be considered to be supervisory authorities concerned where the draft decision concerns only the controller.
Where the processing is carried out by a group of undertakings, the main establishment of the controlling undertaking should be considered to be the main establishment of the group of undertakings, except where the purposes and means of processing are determined by another undertaking.
The latest consolidated version of the Regulation with corrections by Corrigendum, OJ L 127, 23.5.2018, p. 2 ((EU) 2016/679). Source: EUR-lex.