Navigacija
SUVP (GDPR) > Uvodna izjava 129
Prenos PDF

Uvodna izjava 129

Recital 129

(129) Za zagotovitev doslednega spremljanja in izvajanja te uredbe v vsej Uniji bi morali biti naloge in učinkovita pooblastila nadzornih organov v vseh državah članicah enaki, vključno s pooblastili za preiskovanje, popravljalnimi pooblastili in sankcijami ter pooblastili v zvezi z dovoljenji in svetovalnimi pristojnostmi, zlasti v primerih pritožb posameznikov, hkrati pa ne bi smeli vplivati na pooblastila organov, pristojnih za pregon v skladu s pravom držav članic, da sodne organe opozorijo na kršitve te uredbe in sodelujejo v sodnih postopkih.

Taka pooblastila bi morala vključevati tudi pooblastilo za uvedbo začasne ali dokončne omejitve ali prepoved obdelave.

Države članice lahko določijo še druge naloge, povezane z varstvom osebnih podatkov v skladu s to uredbo.

Pooblastila nadzornih organov bi bilo treba izvajati nepristransko, pravično in v razumnem roku v skladu z ustreznimi postopkovnimi zaščitnimi ukrepi, določenimi v pravu Unije in pravu držav članic.

Zlasti bi moral biti vsak ukrep ustrezen, potreben in sorazmeren, da se zagotovi skladnost s to uredbo, pri tem pa se upoštevajo okoliščine posameznega primera, spoštuje pravica vsake osebe, da izrazi svoje mnenje, preden se sprejme kakršen koli posamezen ukrep, ki bi imel zanjo negativne posledice, ter preprečijo nepotrebni stroški in pretirane nevšečnosti za vpletene osebe.

Preiskovalna pooblastila glede dostopa v prostore bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu s posebnimi zahtevami postopkovnega prava držav članic, kot je na primer zahteva pridobitve predhodnega sodnega dovoljenja.

Vsak pravno zavezujoč ukrep nadzornega organa bi moral biti v pisni obliki, jasen in nedvoumen, v njem pa bi morala biti navedena nadzorni organ, ki je ukrep izdal, in datum izdaje ukrepa, podpisati bi ga moral vodja ali član nadzornega organa, ki ga ta pooblasti, vsebovati bi moral razloge za ukrep ter sklic na pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva.

To ne bi smelo izključevati dodatnih zahtev v skladu s postopkovnim pravom držav članic.

Sprejetje pravno zavezujoče odločitve pomeni, da je lahko v državi članici nadzornega organa, ki jo je sprejel, predmet sodne presoje.

(129) In order to ensure consistent monitoring and enforcement of this Regulation throughout the Union, the supervisory authorities should have in each Member State the same tasks and effective powers, including powers of investigation, corrective powers and sanctions, and authorisation and advisory powers, in particular in cases of complaints from natural persons, and without prejudice to the powers of prosecutorial authorities under Member State law, to bring infringements of this Regulation to the attention of the judicial authorities and engage in legal proceedings.

Such powers should also include the power to impose a temporary or definitive limitation, including a ban, on processing.

Member States may specify other tasks related to the protection of personal data under this Regulation.

The powers of supervisory authorities should be exercised in accordance with appropriate procedural safeguards set out in Union and Member State law, impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time.

In particular each measure should be appropriate, necessary and proportionate in view of ensuring compliance with this Regulation, taking into account the circumstances of each individual case, respect the right of every person to be heard before any individual measure which would affect him or her adversely is taken and avoid superfluous costs and excessive inconveniences for the persons concerned.

Investigatory powers as regards access to premises should be exercised in accordance with specific requirements in Member State procedural law, such as the requirement to obtain a prior judicial authorisation.

Each legally binding measure of the supervisory authority should be in writing, be clear and unambiguous, indicate the supervisory authority which has issued the measure, the date of issue of the measure, bear the signature of the head, or a member of the supervisory authority authorised by him or her, give the reasons for the measure, and refer to the right of an effective remedy.

This should not preclude additional requirements pursuant to Member State procedural law.

The adoption of a legally binding decision implies that it may give rise to judicial review in the Member State of the supervisory authority that adopted the decision.