Artikkel 79 📖 GDPR. Rett til et effektivt rettsmiddel overfor en behandlingsansvarlig eller databehandler

Artikkel 79 GDPR. Rett til et effektivt rettsmiddel overfor en behandlingsansvarlig eller databehandler

Article 79 GDPR. Right to an effective judicial remedy against a controller or processor

1. Uten at det berører annen tilgjengelig administrativ eller ikke-rettslig prøving, herunder retten til å klage til en tilsynsmyndighet i henhold til artikkel 77, skal enhver registrert ha rett til et effektivt rettsmiddel dersom vedkommende anser at vedkommendes rettigheter i henhold til denne forordning er krenket som følge av at vedkommendes personopplysninger er blitt behandlet på en måte som ikke er i samsvar med denne forordning.

1. Without prejudice to any available administrative or non-judicial remedy, including the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority pursuant to Article 77, each data subject shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy where he or she considers that his or her rights under this Regulation have been infringed as a result of the processing of his or her personal data in non-compliance with this Regulation.

Relaterte tekster

Artikkel 77 GDPR. Rett til å klage til en tilsynsmyndighet

Article 77 GDPR. Right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority

1. Uten at det berører annen administrativ eller rettslig prøving, skal enhver registrert ha rett til å klage til en tilsynsmyndighet, særlig i den medlemsstat der vedkommende har sitt vanlige bosted, har sitt arbeidssted eller der den påståtte overtredelsen har funnet sted, dersom den registrerte anser at behandlingen av personopplysninger som gjelder vedkommende, er i strid med denne forordning.

1. Without prejudice to any other administrative or judicial remedy, every data subject shall have the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority, in particular in the Member State of his or her habitual residence, place of work or place of the alleged infringement if the data subject considers that the processing of personal data relating to him or her infringes this Regulation.

2. Tilsynsmyndigheten som klagen er inngitt til, skal underrette klageren om klagebehandlingsforløpet og utfallet av klagen, herunder muligheten for rettslig prøving i henhold til artikkel 78.

2. The supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged shall inform the complainant on the progress and the outcome of the complaint including the possibility of a judicial remedy pursuant to Article 78.

2. En sak mot en behandlingsansvarlig eller databehandler skal bringes inn for domstolene i medlemsstaten der den behandlingsansvarlige eller databehandleren er etablert. Alternativt kan en slik sak bringes inn for domstolene i medlemsstaten der den registrerte til vanlig er bosatt, med mindre den behandlingsansvarlige eller databehandleren er en offentlig myndighet som handler innenfor rammen av sin offentlige myndighet.

2. Proceedings against a controller or a processor shall be brought before the courts of the Member State where the controller or processor has an establishment. Alternatively, such proceedings may be brought before the courts of the Member State where the data subject has his or her habitual residence, unless the controller or processor is a public authority of a Member State acting in the exercise of its public powers.

Relaterte tekster

Guidelines 3/2018 on the territorial scope of the GDPR (Article 3)

“An establishment in the Union”

The threshold for “stable arrangement [9]” can actually be quite low when the centre of activities of a controller concerns the provision of services online. As a result, in some circumstances, the presence of one single employee or agent of a non-EU entity in the Union may be sufficient to constitute a stable arrangement (amounting to an ‘establishment’ for the purposes of Art 3(1)) if that employee or agent acts with a sufficient degree of stability. Conversely, when an employee is based in the EU but the processing is not being carried out in the context of the activities of the EU-based employee in the Union (i.e. the processing relates to activities of the controller outside the EU), the mere presence of an employee in the EU will not result in that processing falling within the scope of the GDPR. In other words, the mere presence of an employee in the EU is not as such sufficient to trigger the application of the GDPR, since for the processing in question to fall within the scope of the GDPR, it must also be carried out in the context of the activities of the EU-based employee.

_{[9] Weltimmo, paragraph 31.}

The fact that the non-EU entity responsible for the data processing does not have a branch or subsidiary in a Member State does not preclude it from having an establishment there within the meaning of EU data protection law. Although the notion of establishment is broad, it is not without limits. It is not possible to conclude that the non-EU entity has an establishment in the Union merely because the undertaking’s website is accessible in the Union [10].

_{[10] CJEU, Verein für Konsumenteninformation v. Amazon EU Sarl, Case C‑191/15, 28 July 2016, paragraph 76 (hereafter “Verein für Konsumenteninformation”).}

Generell personvernforordning) [PVF, GDPR]

General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR)

The latest consolidated version of the Regulation with corrections by Corrigendum, OJ L 127, 23.5.2018, p. 2 ((EU) 2016/679). Source: EUR-lex.

Fortalepunkter Legg igjen en kommentar

Fortalepunkter

145) Når det gjelder saker mot en behandlingsansvarlig eller databehandler, bør saksøkeren ha valget mellom å bringe saken inn for domstolene i medlemsstatene der den behandlingsansvarlige eller databehandleren har en virksomhet, eller der den registrerte er bosatt, med mindre den behandlingsansvarlige er en offentlig myndighet i en medlemsstat som handler innenfor rammen av sin offentlige myndighet.

(145) For proceedings against a controller or processor, the plaintiff should have the choice to bring the action before the courts of the Member States where the controller or processor has an establishment or where the data subject resides, unless the controller is a public authority of a Member State acting in the exercise of its public powers.

Legg igjen en kommentar

[js-disqus]