14 pants 📖 VDAR. Informācija, kas jāsniedz, ja personas dati nav iegūti no datu subjekta

14 pants VDAR. Informācija, kas jāsniedz, ja personas dati nav iegūti no datu subjekta

Article 14 GDPR. Information to be provided where personal data have not been obtained from the data subject

1. Ja personas dati nav iegūti no datu subjekta, pārzinis datu subjektam sniedz šādu informāciju:

1. Where personal data have not been obtained from the data subject, the controller shall provide the data subject with the following information:

a) pārziņa un attiecīgā gadījumā pārziņa pārstāvja identitāte un kontaktinformācija;

(a) the identity and the contact details of the controller and, where applicable, of the controller’s representative;

b) attiecīgā gadījumā – datu aizsardzības speciālista kontaktinformācija;

(b) the contact details of the data protection officer, where applicable;

c) apstrādes nolūki, kam paredzēti personas dati, kā arī apstrādes juridiskais pamats;

(c) the purposes of the processing for which the personal data are intended as well as the legal basis for the processing;

d) attiecīgo personas datu kategorijas;

(d) the categories of personal data concerned;

e) personas datu saņēmēji vai saņēmēju kategorijas, ja tādas ir;

(e) the recipients or categories of recipients of the personal data, if any;

f) attiecīgā gadījumā – informācija, ka pārzinis paredz nosūtīt personas datus saņēmējam trešā valstī vai starptautiskai organizācijai, un informācija par to, ka eksistē vai neeksistē Komisijas lēmums par aizsardzības līmeņa pietiekamību, vai – 46. vai 47. pantā, vai 49. panta 1. punkta otrajā daļā minētās nosūtīšanas gadījumā – atsauce uz atbilstošām vai piemērotām garantijām un informācija par to, kā saņemt datu kopiju, vai to, kur tie ir darīti pieejami.

(f) where applicable, that the controller intends to transfer personal data to a recipient in a third country or international organisation and the existence or absence of an adequacy decision by the Commission, or in the case of transfers referred to in Article 46 or 47, or the second subparagraph of Article 49(1), reference to the appropriate or suitable safeguards and the means to obtain a copy of them or where they have been made available.

Savienojumi

46 pants VDAR. Nosūtīšana, pamatojoties uz atbilstošām garantijām

Article 46 GDPR. Transfers subject to appropriate safeguards

47 pants VDAR. Saistoši uzņēmuma noteikumi

Article 47 GDPR. Binding corporate rules

49 pants VDAR. Atkāpes īpašās situācijās

Article 49 GDPR. Derogations for specific situations

1. Ja nav pieņemts lēmums par aizsardzības līmeņa pietiekamību saskaņā ar 45. panta 3. punktu vai nav nodrošinātas atbilstošas garantijas saskaņā ar 46. pantu, tostarp saistoši uzņēmuma noteikumi, personas datu nosūtīšana vai vairākkārtēja nosūtīšana uz trešo valsti vai starptautisku organizāciju notiek tikai tad, ja izpildīts viens no turpmāk minētajiem nosacījumiem:

1. In the absence of an adequacy decision pursuant to Article 45(3), or of appropriate safeguards pursuant to Article 46, including binding corporate rules, a transfer or a set of transfers of personal data to a third country or an international organisation shall take place only on one of the following conditions:

[…]

Ja nosūtīšanu nevar balstīt uz 45. vai 46. pantā ietvertu noteikumu, tostarp noteikumu par saistošiem uzņēmuma noteikumiem, un nav piemērojama neviena no atkāpēm īpašās situācijās saskaņā ar šā punkta pirmo daļu, nosūtīšana uz trešo valsti vai starptautisku organizāciju var notikt tikai tad, ja nosūtīšana neatkārtojas, attiecas vienīgi uz ierobežotu skaitu datu subjektu, ir vajadzīga pārziņa pārliecinošām leģitīmām interesēm, attiecībā uz kurām datu subjekta intereses vai tiesības un brīvības nav svarīgākas, un pārzinis ir novērtējis visus apstākļus saistībā ar datu nosūtīšanu un, pamatojoties uz minēto novērtējumu, ir sniedzis atbilstošas garantijas attiecībā uz personas datu aizsardzību. Pārzinis par nosūtīšanu informē uzraudzības iestādi. Papildus 13. un 14. pantā minētās informācijas sniegšanai pārzinis informē datu subjektu par nosūtīšanu un par pārliecinošām leģitīmām interesēm.

Where a transfer could not be based on a provision in Article 45 or 46, including the provisions on binding corporate rules, and none of the derogations for a specific situation referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph is applicable, a transfer to a third country or an international organisation may take place only if the transfer is not repetitive, concerns only a limited number of data subjects, is necessary for the purposes of compelling legitimate interests pursued by the controller which are not overridden by the interests or rights and freedoms of the data subject, and the controller has assessed all the circumstances surrounding the data transfer and has on the basis of that assessment provided suitable safeguards with regard to the protection of personal data. The controller shall inform the supervisory authority of the transfer. The controller shall, in addition to providing the information referred to in Articles 13 and 14, inform the data subject of the transfer and on the compelling legitimate interests pursued.

[…]

2. Papildus 1. punktā minētajai informācijai, pārzinis datu subjektam sniedz turpmāk norādīto informāciju, kas vajadzīga, lai nodrošinātu godprātīgu un pārredzamu apstrādi attiecībā uz datu subjektu:

2. In addition to the information referred to in paragraph 1, the controller shall provide the data subject with the following information necessary to ensure fair and transparent processing in respect of the data subject:

Savienojumi

Guidelines 4/2019 on Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default Version 2.0.

3.1 Transparency [24]

_{[24]Elaboration on how to understand the concept of transparency can be found in Article 29 Working Party. “Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679”. WP 260 rev.01, 11 April 2018. ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=51025 – endorsed by the EDPB}

65. The controller must be clear and open with the data subject about how they will collect, use and share personal data. Transparency is about enabling data subjects to understand, and if necessary, make use of their rights in Articles 15 to 22. The principle is embedded in Articles 12, 13, 14 and 34. Measures and safeguards put in place to support the principle of transparency should also support the implementation of these Articles.

66. Key design and default elements for the principle of transparency may include:

•Clarity – Information shall be in clear and plain language, concise and intelligible.

•Semantics – Communication should have a clear meaning to the audience in question.

•Accessibility – Information shall be easily accessible for the data subject.

•Contextual – Information should be provided at the relevant time and in the appropriate form.

•Relevance – Information should be relevant and applicable to the specific data subject.

•Universal design – Information shall be accessible to all data subjects, include use of machine readable languages to facilitate and automate readability and clarity.

•Comprehensible – Data subjects should have a fair understanding of what they can expect with regards to the processing of their personal data, particularly when the data subjects are children or other vulnerable groups.

• Multi-channel – Information should be provided in different channels and media, not only the textual, to increase the probability for the information to effectively reach the data subject.

• Layered – The information should be layered in a manner that resolves the tension between completeness and understanding, while accounting for data subjects’ reasonable expectations.

a) laikposms, cik ilgi personas dati tiks glabāti, vai, ja tas nav iespējams, kritēriji, ko izmanto minētā laikposma noteikšanai;

(a) the period for which the personal data will be stored, or if that is not possible, the criteria used to determine that period;

ISO 27701

(EN) ISO/IEC 27701, adopted in 2019, added additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers.

Here is the relevant paragraph to article 14(2)(a) GDPR:

7.4.7 Retention

Control

The organization should not retain PII for longer than is necessary for the purposes for which the PII is processed.

Implementation guidance

The organization should develop and maintain retention schedules for information it retains, taking into account the requirement to retain PII for no longer than is necessary.

…

Pieslēgties
lai piekļūtu pilnam tekstam

b) pārziņa vai trešās personas leģitīmās intereses, ja apstrāde pamatojas uz 6. panta 1. punkta f) apakšpunktu;

(b) where the processing is based on point (f) of Article 6(1), the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or by a third party;

Savienojumi

6 pants VDAR. Apstrādes likumīgums

Article 6 GDPR. Lawfulness of processing

1. Apstrāde ir likumīga tikai tādā apmērā un tikai tad, ja ir piemērojams vismaz viens no turpmāk minētajiem pamatojumiem:

1. Processing shall be lawful only if and to the extent that at least one of the following applies:

[…]

f) apstrāde ir vajadzīga pārziņa vai trešās personas leģitīmo interešu ievērošanai, izņemot, ja datu subjekta intereses vai pamattiesības un pamatbrīvības, kurām nepieciešama personas datu aizsardzība, ir svarīgākas par šādām interesēm, jo īpaši, ja datu subjekts ir bērns.

(f) processing is necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or by a third party, except where such interests are overridden by the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject which require protection of personal data, in particular where the data subject is a child.

[…]

c) tas, ka pastāv tiesības pieprasīt no pārziņa piekļuvi datu subjekta personas datiem un to labošanu vai dzēšanu, vai apstrādes ierobežošanu attiecībā uz datu subjektu un tiesības iebilst pret apstrādi, kā arī tiesības uz datu pārnesamību;

(c) the existence of the right to request from the controller access to and rectification or erasure of personal data or restriction of processing concerning the data subject and to object to processing as well as the right to data portability;

ISO 27701

(EN) ISO/IEC 27701, adopted in 2019, added additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers.

Here is the relevant paragraphs to article 14(2)(c) GDPR:

7.3.5 Providing mechanism to object to PII processing

Control

The organization should provide a mechanism for PII principals to object to the processing of their PII.

Implementation guidance

Some jurisdictions provide PII principals with a right to object to the processing of their PII.

…

Pieslēgties
lai piekļūtu pilnam tekstam

d) ja apstrāde pamatojas uz 6. panta 1. punkta a) apakšpunktu vai 9. panta 2. punkta a) apakšpunktu – tiesības jebkurā brīdī atsaukt piekrišanu, neietekmējot tādas apstrādes likumīgumu, kuras pamatā ir pirms atsaukuma sniegta piekrišana;

(d) where processing is based on point (a) of Article 6(1) or point (a) of Article 9(2), the existence of the right to withdraw consent at any time, without affecting the lawfulness of processing based on consent before its withdrawal;

ISO 27701 Savienojumi

ISO 27701

(EN) ISO/IEC 27701, adopted in 2019, added additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers.

Here is the relevant paragraph to article 14(2)(d) GDPR:

7.3.4 Providing mechanism to modify or withdraw consent

Control

The organization should provide a mechanism for PII principals to modify or withdraw their consent.

Implementation guidance

The organization should inform PII principals of their rights related to withdrawing consent (which may vary by jurisdiction) at any time, and provide the mechanism to do so.

…

Pieslēgties
lai piekļūtu pilnam tekstam

Savienojumi

6 pants VDAR. Apstrādes likumīgums

Article 6 GDPR. Lawfulness of processing

1. Apstrāde ir likumīga tikai tādā apmērā un tikai tad, ja ir piemērojams vismaz viens no turpmāk minētajiem pamatojumiem:

1. Processing shall be lawful only if and to the extent that at least one of the following applies:

a) datu subjekts ir devis piekrišanu savu personas datu apstrādei vienam vai vairākiem konkrētiem nolūkiem;

(a) the data subject has given consent to the processing of his or her personal data for one or more specific purposes;

[…]

9 pants VDAR. Īpašu kategoriju personas datu apstrāde

Article 9 GDPR. Processing of special categories of personal data

1. Ir aizliegta tādu personas datu apstrāde, kas atklāj rases vai etnisko piederību, politiskos uzskatus, reliģisko vai filozofisko pārliecību vai dalību arodbiedrībās, un ģenētisko datu, biometrisko datu, lai veiktu fiziskas personas unikālu identifikāciju, veselības datu vai datu par fiziskas personas dzimumdzīvi vai seksuālo orientāciju apstrāde.

1. Processing of personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, or trade union membership, and the processing of genetic data, biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person, data concerning health or data concerning a natural person’s sex life or sexual orientation shall be prohibited.

[…]

2. Šā panta 1. punktu nepiemēro, ja ir piemērojams kāds no šādiem pamatojumiem:

2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply if one of the following applies:

a) datu subjekts ir devis nepārprotamu piekrišanu šo personas datu apstrādei vienam vai vairākiem konkrētiem nolūkiem, izņemot, ja Savienības vai dalībvalsts tiesību akti paredz, ka 1. punktā minēto aizliegumu datu subjekts nevar atcelt;

(a) the data subject has given explicit consent to the processing of those personal data for one or more specified purposes, except where Union or Member State law provide that the prohibition referred to in paragraph 1 may not be lifted by the data subject;

[…]

Guidelines 4/2019 on Article 25 Data Protection by Design and by Default Version 2.0.

3.2 Lawfulness

67. The controller must identify a valid legal basis for the processing of personal data. Measures and safeguards should support the requirement to make sure that the whole processing lifecycle is in line with the relevant legal grounds of processing.

e) tiesības iesniegt sūdzību uzraudzības iestādei;

(e) the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority;

f) informācija par to, no kāda avota personas dati ir iegūti, un – attiecīgā gadījumā – informācija par to, vai dati iegūti no publiski pieejamiem avotiem;

(f) from which source the personal data originate, and if applicable, whether it came from publicly accessible sources;

g) tas, ka pastāv automatizēta lēmumu pieņemšana, tostarp profilēšana, kas minēta 22. panta 1. un 4. punktā, un – vismaz minētajos gadījumos – jēgpilna informācija par tajā ietverto loģiku, kā arī šādas apstrādes nozīmīgumu un paredzamajām sekām attiecībā uz datu subjektu.

(g) the existence of automated decision-making, including profiling, referred to in Article 22(1) and (4) and, at least in those cases, meaningful information about the logic involved, as well as the significance and the envisaged consequences of such processing for the data subject.

ISO 27701 Savienojumi

ISO 27701

(EN) ISO/IEC 27701, adopted in 2019, added additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers.

Here is the relevant paragraph to article 14(2)(g) GDPR:

7.3.10 Automated decision making

Control

The organization should identify and address obligations, including legal obligations, to the PII principals resulting from decisions made by the organization which are related to the PII principal based solely on automated processing of PII.

…

Pieslēgties
lai piekļūtu pilnam tekstam

Savienojumi

22 pants VDAR. Automatizēta individuālu lēmumu pieņemšana, tostarp profilēšana

Article 22 GDPR. Automated individual decision-making, including profiling

1. Datu subjektam ir tiesības nebūt tāda lēmuma subjektam, kura pamatā ir tikai automatizēta apstrāde, tostarp profilēšana, kas attiecībā uz datu subjektu rada tiesiskās sekas vai kas līdzīgā veidā ievērojami ietekmē datu subjektu.

1. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her.

4 pants VDAR. Definīcijas

Article 4 GDPR. Definitions

Šajā regulā:

For the purposes of this Regulation:

[…]

4) “profilēšana” ir jebkura veida automatizēta personas datu apstrāde, kas izpaužas kā personas datu izmantošana nolūkā izvērtēt konkrētus ar fizisku personu saistītus personiskus aspektus, jo īpaši analizēt vai prognozēt aspektus saistībā ar minētās fiziskās personas sniegumu darbā, ekonomisko situāciju, veselību, personīgām vēlmēm, interesēm, uzticamību, uzvedību, atrašanās vietu vai pārvietošanos;

(4) ‘profiling’ means any form of automated processing of personal data consisting of the use of personal data to evaluate certain personal aspects relating to a natural person, in particular to analyse or predict aspects concerning that natural person’s performance at work, economic situation, health, personal preferences, interests, reliability, behaviour, location or movements;

[…]

3. Pārzinis 1. un 2. punktā minēto informāciju sniedz:

3. The controller shall provide the information referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2:

a) saprātīgā termiņā pēc personas datu iegūšanas, bet vēlākais mēneša laikā, ņemot vērā konkrētos apstākļus, kādos personas dati tiek apstrādāti;

(a) within a reasonable period after obtaining the personal data, but at the latest within one month, having regard to the specific circumstances in which the personal data are processed;

b) ja personas datus ir paredzēts izmantot saziņai ar datu subjektu – vēlākais tad, kad ar minēto datu subjektu notiek pirmā saziņa; vai

(b) if the personal data are to be used for communication with the data subject, at the latest at the time of the first communication to that data subject; or

c) vēlākais tad, kad personas dati pirmoreiz tiek izpausti, ja ir paredzēts tos izpaust citam saņēmējam.

(c) if a disclosure to another recipient is envisaged, at the latest when the personal data are first disclosed.

4. Ja pārzinis paredz personas datus turpmāk apstrādāt citā nolūkā, kas nav nolūks, kādā personas dati tika iegūti, pārzinis pirms minētās turpmākās apstrādes informē datu subjektu par minēto citu nolūku un sniedz tam visu attiecīgo papildu informāciju, kā minēts 2. punktā.

4. Where the controller intends to further process the personal data for a purpose other than that for which the personal data were obtained, the controller shall provide the data subject prior to that further processing with information on that other purpose and with any relevant further information as referred to in paragraph 2.

5. Šā panta 1.–4. punktu nepiemēro, ja un ciktāl:

5. Paragraphs 1 to 4 shall not apply where and insofar as:

a) informācija jau ir datu subjekta rīcībā;

(a) the data subject already has the information;

b) izrādās, ka šādas informācijas sniegšana nav iespējama vai tā prasītu nesamērīgi lielas pūles; jo īpaši attiecībā uz apstrādi arhivēšanas nolūkos sabiedrības interesēs, zinātniskās vai vēstures pētniecības nolūkos, vai statistikas nolūkos, ievērojot 89. panta 1. punktā minētos nosacījumus un garantijas, vai ciktāl šā panta 1. punktā minētie pienākumi varētu neļaut vai būtiski traucēt sasniegt minētās apstrādes mērķus. Šādos gadījumos pārzinis veic atbilstošus pasākumus, lai aizsargātu datu subjekta tiesības un brīvības, un leģitīmās intereses, tostarp darot informāciju publiski pieejamu;

(b) the provision of such information proves impossible or would involve a disproportionate effort, in particular for processing for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes, subject to the conditions and safeguards referred to in Article 89(1) or in so far as the obligation referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article is likely to render impossible or seriously impair the achievement of the objectives of that processing. In such cases the controller shall take appropriate measures to protect the data subject’s rights and freedoms and legitimate interests, including making the information publicly available;

Savienojumi

89 pants VDAR. Garantijas un atkāpes, kas attiecas uz apstrādi arhivēšanas nolūkos sabiedrības interesēs, zinātniskās vai vēstures pētniecības nolūkos vai statistikas nolūkos

Article 89 GDPR. Safeguards and derogations relating to processing for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes

1. Uz apstrādi arhivēšanas nolūkos sabiedrības interesēs, zinātniskās vai vēstures pētniecības nolūkos, vai statistikas nolūkos saskaņā ar šo regulu attiecas atbilstošas garantijas datu subjekta tiesībām un brīvībām. Ar minētajām garantijām nodrošina, ka pastāv tehniski un organizatoriski pasākumi, jo īpaši, lai nodrošinātu datu minimizēšanas principa ievērošanu. Minētie pasākumi var ietvert pseidonimizēšanu, ar noteikumu, ka minētos nolūkus var sasniegt minētajā veidā. Ja minētos nolūkus var sasniegt, veicot turpmāku apstrādi, kas neļauj vai vairs neļauj identificēt datu subjektus, minētos nolūkus sasniedz minētajā veidā.

1. Processing for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes, shall be subject to appropriate safeguards, in accordance with this Regulation, for the rights and freedoms of the data subject. Those safeguards shall ensure that technical and organisational measures are in place in particular in order to ensure respect for the principle of data minimisation. Those measures may include pseudonymisation provided that those purposes can be fulfilled in that manner. Where those purposes can be fulfilled by further processing which does not permit or no longer permits the identification of data subjects, those purposes shall be fulfilled in that manner.

[…]

Article 29 Working Party Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679

“Proves impossible”

The situation where it “proves impossible” under Article 14.5(b) to provide the information is an all or nothing situation because something is either impossible or it is not; there are no degrees of impossibility. Thus if a data controller seeks to rely on this exemption it must demonstrate the factors that actually prevent it from providing the information in question to data subjects. If, after a certain period of time, the factors that caused the “impossibility” no longer exist and it becomes possible to provide the information to data subjects then the data controller should immediately do so. In practice, there will be very few situations in which a data controller can demonstrate that it is actually impossible to provide the information to data subjects. The following example demonstrates this.

Article 29 Working Party Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679

“Disproportionate effort”

In determining what may constitute either impossibility or disproportionate effort under Article 14.5(b), it is relevant that there are no comparable exemptions under Article 13 (where personal data is collected from a data subject). The only difference between an Article 13 and an Article 14 situation is that in the latter, the personal data is not collected from the data subject. It therefore follows that impossibility or disproportionate effort typically arises by virtue of circumstances which do not apply if the personal data is collected from the data subject. In other words, the impossibility or disproportionate effort must be directly connected to the fact that the personal data was obtained other than from the data subject.

Guidelines on consent under Regulation 2016/679

Scientific research

153. Recital 33 seems to bring some flexibility to the degree of specification and granularity of consent in the context of scientific research. Recital 33 states: “It is often not possible to fully identify the purpose of personal data processing for scientific research purposes at the time of data collection. Therefore, data subjects should be allowed to give their consent to certain areas of scientific research when in keeping with recognised ethical standards for scientific research. Data subjects should have the opportunity to give their consent only to certain areas of research or parts of research projects to the extent allowed by the intended purpose.”

c) iegūšana vai izpaušana ir skaidri paredzēta Savienības vai dalībvalsts tiesību aktos, kuri ir piemērojami pārzinim un kuros ir paredzēti atbilstoši pasākumi datu subjekta leģitīmo interešu aizsardzībai; vai

(c) obtaining or disclosure is expressly laid down by Union or Member State law to which the controller is subject and which provides appropriate measures to protect the data subject’s legitimate interests; or

Savienojumi

Article 29 Working Party Guidelines on transparency under Regulation 2016/679

The factors referred to above in Recital 62 (number of data subjects, the age of the data and any appropriate safeguards adopted) may be indicative of the types of issues that contribute to a data controller having to use disproportionate effort to notify a data subject of the relevant Article 14 information.

Article 14.5(c) allows for a lifting of the information requirements in Articles 14.1, 14.2 and 14.4 insofar as the obtaining or disclosure of personal data “is expressly laid down by Union or Member State law to which the controller is subject”. This exemption is conditional upon the law in question providing “appropriate measures to protect the data subject’s legitimate interests”. Such a law must directly address the data controller and the obtaining or disclosure in question should be mandatory upon the data controller. Accordingly, the data controller must be able to demonstrate how the law in question applies to them and requires them to either obtain or disclose the personal data in question. While it is for Union or Member State law to frame the law such that it provides “appropriate measures to protect the data subject’s legitimate interests”, the data controller should ensure (and be able to demonstrate) that its obtaining or disclosure of personal data complies with those measures. Furthermore, the data controller should make it clear to data subjects that it obtains or discloses personal data in accordance with the law in question, unless there is a legal prohibition preventing the data controller from doing so. This is in line with Recital 41 of the GDPR, which states that a legal basis or legislative measure should be clear and precise, and its application should be foreseeable to persons subject to it, in accordance with the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and the European Court of Human Rights. However, Article 14.5(c) will not apply where the data controller is under an obligation to obtain data directly from a data subject, in which case Article 13 will apply. In that case, the only exemption under the GDPR exempting the controller from providing the data subject with information on the processing will be that under Article 13.4 (i.e. where and insofar as the data subject already has the information). However, as referred to below at paragraph 68, at a national level, Member States may also legislate, in accordance with Article 23, for further specific restrictions to the right to transparency under Article 12 and to information under Articles 13 and 14.

d) ir jāsaglabā personas datu konfidencialitāte, ievērojot dienesta noslēpuma glabāšanas pienākumu, ko reglamentē ar Savienības vai dalībvalsts tiesību aktiem, ieskaitot statūtos noteiktu pienākumu glabāt noslēpumu.

(d) where the personal data must remain confidential subject to an obligation of professional secrecy regulated by Union or Member State law, including a statutory obligation of secrecy.

Vispārīgā datu aizsardzības regula (VDAR)

General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR)

The latest consolidated version of the Regulation with corrections by Corrigendum, OJ L 127, 23.5.2018, p. 2 ((EU) 2016/679). Source: EUR-lex.

Ekspertu komentāri ISO 27701 Vadlīnijas & Case Law Atstājiet savu komentāru

Ekspertu komentāri

(EN) To facilitate the work of our consultants, we have collected all the requirements and information that have to be mentioned and created a convenient checklist. Next to each paragraph, we have placed links to specific GDPR articles and guidelines. We grouped all the information into 7 sections:

Controller’s identity
Purpose and lawful basis for processing
Personal data
Transfers of data to third countries
Rights
Changes (in privacy notices)
Form (of information provided)

It looks like this:

…

Pieslēgties
lai piekļūtu pilnam tekstam

(EN) Author

(EN) Siarhei Varankevich CIPP/E, CIPM, CIPT, MBA, FIP

(EN) Co-Founder & CEO of Data Privacy Office LLC. Data Protection Trainer and Principal Consultant

(EN) Ask a question

(EN)

Data Subject Request Letter Sample

Concern: Request of information regarding my personal data

Dear Madam, Dear Sir,

I have a right to be informed, under Article 14 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), about personal data concerning me that you are processing and that you obtained from any other sources than me…

…

Pieslēgties
lai piekļūtu pilnam tekstam

(EN) Author

(EN) Louis-Philippe Gratton PhD, LLM

(EN) Privacy Expert

(EN) Ask a question

ISO 27701

(EN) ISO/IEC 27701, adopted in 2019, added additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers.

Here is the relevant paragraph to article 14 GDPR:

7.3.2 Determining information for PII principals

Control

The organization should determine and document the information to be provided to PII principals regarding the processing of their PII and the timing of such a provision.

Implementation guidance

The organization should determine the legal, regulatory and/or business requirements for when information is to be provided to the PII principal (e.g. prior to processing, within a certain time from when it is requested, etc.) and for the type of information to be provided.

…

Pieslēgties
lai piekļūtu pilnam tekstam

Vadlīnijas & Case Law

(EN)