Aithris 43
Recital 43
(43) Chun a áirithiú go dtugtar an toiliú sin faoi shaoirse, níor cheart toiliú a bheith ina fhoras bailí dlíthiúil le sonraí pearsanta a phróiseáil i gcás sonrach ina bhfuil éagothromaíocht shoiléir idir an t-ábhar sonraí agus an rialaitheoir, go háirithe i gcás inar údarás poiblí é an rialaitheoir agus ní dócha, dá bhrí sin, gur tugadh an toiliú sin faoi shaoirse sna cúinsí uile a bhain leis an staid shonrach sin.
Toimhdítear nár tugadh toiliú faoi shaoirse más rud é nach gceadaítear leis toiliú ar leithligh a thabhairt d’oibríochtaí próiseála sonraí pearsanta éagsúla in ainneoin gurb iomchuí é sin sa chás ar leith, nó más rud é go bhfuil comhlíonadh conartha, lena n-áirítear cur ar fáil seirbhíse, ag brath ar an toiliú sin, in ainneoin nach dteastaíonn toiliú den sórt sin le haghaidh comhlíonadh den sórt sin.
(43) In order to ensure that consent is freely given, consent should not provide a valid legal ground for the processing of personal data in a specific case where there is a clear imbalance between the data subject and the controller, in particular where the controller is a public authority and it is therefore unlikely that consent was freely given in all the circumstances of that specific situation.
Consent is presumed not to be freely given if it does not allow separate consent to be given to different personal data processing operations despite it being appropriate in the individual case, or if the performance of a contract, including the provision of a service, is dependent on the consent despite such consent not being necessary for such performance.
The latest consolidated version of the Regulation with corrections by Corrigendum, OJ L 127, 23.5.2018, p. 2 ((EU) 2016/679). Source: EUR-lex.