(36) Glavni sedež upravljavca v Uniji bi moral biti kraj njegove osrednje uprave v Uniji, razen če se odločitve o namenih in sredstvih obdelave osebnih podatkov sprejemajo na drugem sedežu upravljavca v Uniji in bi v tem primeru moral ta drugi sedež veljati za glavni sedež. Glavni sedež upravljavca v Uniji bi moral biti določen v skladu z objektivnimi merili ter bi moral pomeniti učinkovito in dejansko izvajanje dejavnosti upravljanja, ki glavne odločitve glede namenov in sredstev za obdelavo določajo prek ustaljenih ureditev. To merilo ne bi smelo biti odvisno od tega, ali se obdelava osebnih podatkov izvaja v tem kraju. Prisotnost in uporaba tehničnih sredstev in tehnologij za obdelavo osebnih podatkov ali dejavnosti obdelave sami po sebi ne pomenita glavnega sedeža in zato nista odločujoče merilo za glavni sedež. Glavni sedež obdelovalca bi moral biti kraj njegove osrednje uprave v Uniji ali, kadar nima osrednje uprave v Uniji, kraj, kjer potekajo glavne dejavnosti obdelave v Uniji. V primerih, ki vključujejo upravljavca in obdelovalca, bi moral biti pristojni vodilni nadzorni organ še naprej nadzorni organ države članice, v kateri ima upravljavec glavni sedež, nadzorni organ obdelovalca pa bi se moral šteti za zadevni nadzorni organ; ta nadzorni organ bi moral biti udeležen v postopku sodelovanja, določenem v tej uredbi. Vsekakor se nadzorni organi države članice ali držav članic, v katerih ima obdelovalec enega ali več sedežev, ne bi smeli šteti kot zadevni nadzorni organi, kadar osnutek odločitve zadeva samo upravljavca. Kadar obdelavo izvaja povezana družba, bi bilo treba glavni sedež obvladujoče družbe šteti za glavni sedež povezane družbe, razen kadar namene in sredstva obdelave določa druga družba.
(36) The main establishment of a controller in the Union should be the place of its central administration in the Union, unless the decisions on the purposes and means of the processing of personal data are taken in another establishment of the controller in the Union, in which case that other establishment should be considered to be the main establishment. The main establishment of a controller in the Union should be determined according to objective criteria and should imply the effective and real exercise of management activities determining the main decisions as to the purposes and means of processing through stable arrangements. That criterion should not depend on whether the processing of personal data is carried out at that location. The presence and use of technical means and technologies for processing personal data or processing activities do not, in themselves, constitute a main establishment and are therefore not determining criteria for a main establishment. The main establishment of the processor should be the place of its central administration in the Union or, if it has no central administration in the Union, the place where the main processing activities take place in the Union. In cases involving both the controller and the processor, the competent lead supervisory authority should remain the supervisory authority of the Member State where the controller has its main establishment, but the supervisory authority of the processor should be considered to be a supervisory authority concerned and that supervisory authority should participate in the cooperation procedure provided for by this Regulation. In any case, the supervisory authorities of the Member State or Member States where the processor has one or more establishments should not be considered to be supervisory authorities concerned where the draft decision concerns only the controller. Where the processing is carried out by a group of undertakings, the main establishment of the controlling undertaking should be considered to be the main establishment of the group of undertakings, except where the purposes and means of processing are determined by another undertaking.
(124) Kadar obdelava osebnih podatkov poteka v okviru dejavnosti sedeža upravljavca ali obdelovalca v Uniji in ima upravljavec ali obdelovalec sedež v več kot eni državi članici ali kadar obdelava, ki poteka v okviru dejavnosti edinega sedeža upravljavca ali obdelovalca v Uniji, znatno vpliva oziroma bi lahko znatno vplivala na posameznike, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, v več kot eni državi članici, bi moral nadzorni organ za glavni sedež upravljavca ali obdelovalca ali za edini sedež upravljavca ali obdelovalca delovati kot vodilni organ. Sodelovati bi moral z drugimi zadevnimi organi, ker ima upravljavec ali obdelovalec sedež na ozemlju njihove države članice, ker obdelava znatno vpliva na posameznike, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki in ki prebivajo na njihovem ozemlju, ali ker je bila pri njih vložena pritožba. Četudi je pritožbo vložil posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki in ki ne prebiva v zadevni državi članici, bi moral biti nadzorni organ, pri katerem je bila vložena pritožba, tudi zadevni nadzorni organ. Odbor bi moral imeti možnost, da v okviru svojih nalog izdajanja smernic za vsako vprašanje v zvezi z uporabo te uredbe izda smernice zlasti glede meril, ki jih je treba upoštevati, da se ugotovi, ali zadevna obdelava znatno vpliva na posameznike, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, v več kot eni državi članici, in glede tega, kaj so ustrezni in utemeljeni razlogi za ugovor.
(124) Where the processing of personal data takes place in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the Union and the controller or processor is established in more than one Member State, or where processing taking place in the context of the activities of a single establishment of a controller or processor in the Union substantially affects or is likely to substantially affect data subjects in more than one Member State, the supervisory authority for the main establishment of the controller or processor or for the single establishment of the controller or processor should act as lead authority. It should cooperate with the other authorities concerned, because the controller or processor has an establishment on the territory of their Member State, because data subjects residing on their territory are substantially affected, or because a complaint has been lodged with them. Also where a data subject not residing in that Member State has lodged a complaint, the supervisory authority with which such complaint has been lodged should also be a supervisory authority concerned. Within its tasks to issue guidelines on any question covering the application of this Regulation, the Board should be able to issue guidelines in particular on the criteria to be taken into account in order to ascertain whether the processing in question substantially affects data subjects in more than one Member State and on what constitutes a relevant and reasoned objection.
(125) Vodilni organ bi moral biti pristojen za sprejemanje zavezujočih odločitev v zvezi z ukrepi, na podlagi katerih se uporabljajo pooblastila, ki so mu bila dodeljena v skladu s to uredbo. Nadzorni organ bi moral v vlogi vodilnega organa v postopek odločanja tesno pritegniti zadevne nadzorne organe in usklajevati njihove dejavnosti. Kadar odločitev zadeva popolno ali delno zavrnitev pritožbe posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, bi moral to odločitev sprejeti nadzorni organ, pri katerem je bila vložena pritožba.
(125) The lead authority should be competent to adopt binding decisions regarding measures applying the powers conferred on it in accordance with this Regulation. In its capacity as lead authority, the supervisory authority should closely involve and coordinate the supervisory authorities concerned in the decision-making process. Where the decision is to reject the complaint by the data subject in whole or in part, that decision should be adopted by the supervisory authority with which the complaint has been lodged.